Support BikePortland

League confirms: Google Maps now has biking directions

Posted by on March 9th, 2010 at 9:28 pm

There it is.

The League of American Bicyclists has just sent out a press release confirming what I speculated (and all but confirmed) earlier today — Google has turned on biking directions for Google Maps.

Google will publicly announce the big news at Wednesday morning’s Opening Plenary Session. About the announcement, the League’s Andy Clarke says, “… It is a game-changer, especially for those short trips that are the most polluting… This new tool will open people’s eyes to the possibility and practicality of hopping on a bike and riding.”

In addition to an option for “Bicycling” directions, Google also has a new layer view that include

A view of Portland with the “bicycling” layer turned on. Green shows bike routes (note for you non-Portlanders, the green line on Waterfront Park is an off-street, multi-use path).

According to Google, bike directions have been the most requested addition to Google Maps.

I tried out the feature using Portland as my base location (I’ll confirm tomorrow what cities the bicycling layer works in) and it worked well. With the “bicycling” layer turned on, I noticed it automatically found off-street paths like the Waterfront Park path and the Springwater Corridor Trail.

Here’s a blurb from the League’s press release:

“Simply enter a start point and destination and select “Bicycling” from the drop-down menu. You will receive a route that is optimized for cycling, taking advantage of bike trails, bike lanes, and bike-friendly streets and avoiding hilly terrain whenever possible.”

Read Gabe Tiller tried a route from Northeast Portland to Oaks Park via the Springwater and reports that it’s not the exact route he’d use. Another person via Twitter said it recommended riding on West Burnside, a very unsafe street for bikes.

I’ve got a demo scheduled with a Google rep tomorrow. If you have questions you want me to ask her, leave them in the comments. In the mean time, I’d love to know if the bicycling feature works for you. Give it a try and report back in the comments 1) if it’s turned on in your area and 2) if it works.

Bike Summit coverage sponsored by Planet Bike. More stories on our special coverage page.

Please support BikePortland.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

  • Tyler March 9, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    This is incredibly awesome!

    It works for me as I look around on bike directions for the Portland area…but they still need to work on providing safe road routes as they recommend for traveling. Some of their provided bike directions and routes seem a little sketch to me.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Randall March 9, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    It works pretty well in Minneapolis.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John Russell (jr98664) March 9, 2010 at 9:41 pm

    I’m in Vancouver, WA, and even with the same directions, I’m not getting any option to select cycling.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Kenji March 9, 2010 at 9:44 pm

    Salem is up and running.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Kenji March 9, 2010 at 9:47 pm

    PS. Do you know whether Google knows about the county and city maps that show biking routes in OR?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Sam March 9, 2010 at 9:51 pm

    I am so excited about this!

    It works here in San Diego but it is not perfect. We do have canyons to contend with…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Sarah March 9, 2010 at 9:53 pm

    How exciting! Just as a test I did directions from E. Gresham to where I work in NE Portland and it gave me a crazy long route with a couple sketchy intersections that I’d never take. Hopefully it gets a little smarter over time.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Logan March 9, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    Fantastic! Google maps bicycling layer is up for Davis, CA and Sacramento, CA. A brief test of the mapping looks like it recommends longer, more scenic routes, but hey its a start! I’m so glad its finally here! 🙂

    Cheers and thanks for the head’s up! 🙂

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Ted March 9, 2010 at 9:58 pm

    Works well in Eugene. This is a big deal.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Daniel Ronan March 9, 2010 at 10:01 pm

    This is great! I wonder, however, if this bicycling feature could be met with concerns from property owners on whose property cross some of these paths. I could see that some paths may be popular but are not legally recognized. Maybe Google could give us some insight into how these paths were selected?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Sarah March 9, 2010 at 10:06 pm

    Update on my comment I just made regarding the route from Gresham to NE PDX. I realized that the bike feature doesn’t recognize bike routes in Gresham, with the exception of Springwater. That’s probably why it gave me an odd route (clear down to Springwater over to I-205 path and up to another strange route that I wouldn’t choose).

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor) March 9, 2010 at 10:13 pm

      Forgot to mention in the post initially… but if you have specific questions for Google, please let me know and I’ll ask them and report back. thanks for all the feedback.. keep it coming.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John Russell (jr98664) March 9, 2010 at 10:15 pm

    It’s working now, but it won’t allow you to drag the route to legally ridable freeways, and even otherwise limited-access roads. While this probably isn’t a concern for most, it’s certainly a deal-breaker for me, especially in a few locations where it’s the only option.

    What they really need is a sliding scale of route difficulty, so that each cyclist can adjust the mapping to his individual skill level. That would be perfect.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • William Bendsen March 9, 2010 at 10:18 pm

    William from Copenhagen here.
    It seems that it’s only enabled for US territories, incl. Alaska and Hawaii. As soon as you move around on the map, the bicycle option simply dissapears.

    Even though we have our own, for Copenhagen and the surrounding area, it’d be good to have it incoorporated in Google Maps.

    (Use caution when clicking the links. They are only included for the curious, and are 5 and .8 MB PDF-files.)

    Congratulations on your new route-planning tool.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • jim March 9, 2010 at 10:24 pm

    3 days and 22 hrs from portland to boise

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Seager March 9, 2010 at 10:25 pm

    Eugene’s is great, but misses a few “traffic calmed” streets in favor of parallel bike lanes streets a few blocks away.

    It’ll never beat experienced local knowledge, but it will be great for new and average riders, and especially students and visitors!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mikeybikey March 9, 2010 at 10:26 pm

    love it. it does not always give the best route, but the results will get better with time. i did notice that, like with the car directions, you can drag points around to alter the route and google automatically updates its suggestion. if you think of it, ask the google rep if they will be mining user interactions like this route altering to help produce better results.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • eli bishop March 9, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    pdx: no way to get from i205 path onto powell: even when you drag to change the route it jumps onto se 92nd. but there’s a lovely overpass to cross powell, really!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Shane March 9, 2010 at 11:11 pm

    New post on the feature in Eugene is up on It’s working great. I love how it shows all the cut through paths in the neighborhoods!
    It’s missing some “goat trails” obviously but seems to have all the paths, bike lane roads, etc.
    VERY exciting!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Bob T. March 9, 2010 at 11:17 pm

    Glad to have Google Bike Maps. I would like to know if Google will bring to the mobile world. I would presume Android first but what about iPhone and other smart phones?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Matty March 9, 2010 at 11:18 pm

    Could you ask the rep Google’s plans for (crowdsourced) updates for optimized bike routing solutions? Where did they get their data for Portland (or the Region)?

    Can their routing algorithm handle turn impedances?

    When (how) are they going to update their bike network?

    If someone has better data for their model, who should they contact?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Galen Seitz March 9, 2010 at 11:27 pm

    12 days and 10 hours to Boston, but the time will just fly by because you will be busy navigating through 1736 steps worth of directions.

    On a more local note, a trip from SE to the Mission Theater sends you up Couch. I would probably ride straight up Glisan. Clearly it will be difficult for them to please everyone. A trip from SE to PSU involves some interesting contortions at the east end of the Hawthorne bridge as well as downtown. I’m sure it will take some time for them to refine the results.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • jim March 9, 2010 at 11:41 pm

    “I’m not getting any option to select cycling.”
    click around on some different things, i found it and it looked different than the picture above

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John Lascurettes March 10, 2010 at 12:19 am

    It’s interesting some of the routes. They’re mostly okay, but they take some adjusting.

    They seem to magnetize to the green routes that are marked on the map, even when a quiet and direct side street is available. For example, I’d rather bike east to west from Hollywood area to downtown using NE Knott than I would NE Broadway, but it gravitated to Broadway presumably because of the bike lane.

    Jonathan, please ask Google to provide a legend for their bicycle overlay. What do the different shades of green and solid v. dashed lines mean?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John Lascurettes March 10, 2010 at 12:24 am

    Oh, another question for Google. How do we provide feedback for fixes?

    For example:
    Heading westbound on Broadway over the bridge, it actually shows bikes crossing to the southern sidewalk at the bridge and then back to the proper travel side after the bridge even though they show the north side of the bridge as a green lane for bikes (which is seemingly only approachable from N Larrabee Street and not from N Broadway itself).

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jay R. March 10, 2010 at 1:00 am

    I can still, under no circumstances, make a bike option appear. I’ve tried routes all over Portland. From my home on Mt. Scott to Downtown, various places around town, even routes contained completely within downtown.

    Car, Public Transportation, or Walking … that’s it.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Mike March 10, 2010 at 1:02 am

    In Portland, we’ve had for a while, and it probably does a better job since google is still in beta. I’d be interested to hear people’s opinions on any differences though.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Ian March 10, 2010 at 1:17 am

    I’m impressed that it charted a different route for me when I reversed the direction. Google Maps wisely knew it is not a good idea to try and bike up Taylor’s Ferry from the Sellwood Bridge, but that going down is fine!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Burk March 10, 2010 at 1:53 am

    This is awesome! Thanks Google!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • […] guys standing around with blue Google t-shirts. In addition to a big announcement from Google about their new bike directions feature, there is an excellent panel of speakers on […]

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Brian March 10, 2010 at 5:20 am

    Smaller cities seem covered as well. South Bend, Indiana is on the biking grid.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Anonymous March 10, 2010 at 5:23 am

    Working for Orange County CA. Tried to view route on G Earth. I could not get that feature to work. Showed up in folder but would not display on map. Ask G if they are going to let us import the route to Garmin Edge for bikes. They should make it a simple link right from maps to save the map to a compatible file.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • parker March 10, 2010 at 5:53 am

    Corvallis is up; directions for my daily commute (which I’ll start in 40 mins) are hilariously inappropriate. There’s a notice: “Bicycling directions are in beta.
    Use caution and please report unmapped bike routes, streets that aren’t suited for cycling, and other problems here (link).” So it looks like the process of crowd-sourcing corrections and updates has begun. You’re off to a promising start: Thanks, Google!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Steven Vance March 10, 2010 at 6:22 am

    It’s kind of whacky in Chicago.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Steven Vance March 10, 2010 at 6:24 am

    It’s kind of whacky in Chicago:

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • 3-speeder March 10, 2010 at 6:54 am

    Bike directions work on Google Maps for the small town in northern Wisconsin where I live.

    For a local destination a couple of miles away, it selects the paved multi-use path that is available.

    For a neighboring town, it gives a 10-mile option on highway with shoulders as well as a 16 mile option on calmer roads.

    It also came up with directions that seem largely off the main highways to towns about 40-70 miles away, to Madison about 350 miles away, and to Portland a few thousand miles away.

    Way cool!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Steven Soto March 10, 2010 at 7:07 am

    My commute is spot on. I take a shortcut through a park MUP that has never shown up on Google maps until today. I commute from Sherwood, OR to Tualatin, OR.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Stig7 March 10, 2010 at 7:10 am

    Trying it out now. Looks awesome.

    Google isn’t aware of the 205 being fully reopened now. It stops at SE Harold on the map. It also doesn’t recognize the full length of the i84 path.

    ‘Bicycling directions are in beta.
    Use caution and please report unmapped bike routes, streets that aren’t suited for cycling, and other problems..’ (link is on the map left nav.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John Lascurettes March 10, 2010 at 7:52 am

    There’s the main page up now:

    The video on that page answers all of my questions above about making corrections and what do the different green lines mean.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • buglas March 10, 2010 at 7:55 am

    Well, it passes the 16th and Tillamook test for Portland.

    Here in Corvallis, I have sent in my first feedback on a missing path. Thinking of the folks who will be doing the manual entry of the new data, I gave them a point to point route from one end of the path to the other and included a link to the city’s local bike map for reference.

    Also entered their drawing. Thanks Google!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Slo Joe Recumbo March 10, 2010 at 8:09 am

    The “green” is up and working in Miami, but how Google picks a route isn’t the best for biking.

    For example, there’s a big rail trail that Google didn’t use but instead routed me all over the place to get from point A to B.

    Where I see an immediate benefit is the “sight”ing of the green areas of bikes.

    What is quite obvious in looking at Miami is there there are few, if any, connected bike trails/paths, etc.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Pete March 10, 2010 at 8:52 am

    I’d be impressed if I could save a TCX or GPX file. Better yet upload one, modify it, and then save it. And view climbing profiles.

    I don’t ask for much. 🙂

    (and am partial to

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • justacommuter March 10, 2010 at 9:00 am

    I was having trouble just like those in some comments above (3 & 26). The option simply wasn’t showing up in the pull-down menu. Finally, I tried it in Firefox and it worked great. Also works in IE.

    But here’s the weird part: the browser in which it isn’t working is Google Chrome!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Amos March 10, 2010 at 9:00 am

    I also feel like it prefers arterials with bike lanes to side streets (bike boulevards in Portland’s case) I can understand how in some towns/locations this may be a better option, but I would hate for the general, new-to-biking public to think that these busy streets are the only way to go when a lovely, easy, and safe option exists a block or two away.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Refunk March 10, 2010 at 9:13 am


    A route from Vantucky out Marine Dr. to Bull Run & [the town of] Sandy and back along the Springwater to the Steel Bridge, which I mapped using “walking” mode around 0100 hrs today only changed by a fraction of a mile in “bicycle” mode over its @70 mile length.

    Comparing a previously mapped “walking” route from Hayden Island, Portland, to Chicago, however, the length increased by over 300 miles and the time decreased by twenty (20) days! We’re talkin’ RAAM-class bicycle travel speeds now; obviously, not intended as a tour planner, methinks. ‘Specially considering the super-isolated routing cross-country (skipping way too many towns along the way – I’m all for isolated, adventurous riding, etc. but where ya gonna tank up?).

    To Google’s credit, the database automatically routed along the Cowboy Trail in Nebraska, passed within 20 miles of Le Mars, Iowa (Ice Cream Capitol of the World), and made good use of the rail-trails & MUPs in Illinois leading to Chi-town. Except for the odd increase in mileage and Tour-de-France speed projections, I’m genuinely impressed.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Kt March 10, 2010 at 9:34 am


    On the Get Directions tab I entered my home address and my work address to see what routes it suggests.

    This is from Tigard over by Walnut St to Durham over near I-5.

    One of the options it gave me was to go down Walnut (no shoulder or bike lane, signed 30 and everyone goes 40+) and over to 72nd (even worse than Walnut, heavy traffic, no shoulder or bike lane).

    The other two options had me cutting through neighborhoods, making lots of unnecessary turns when it would be faster to stay on Hall which has a nice bike lane.

    The directions feature for Tigard seems to prefer neighborhood streets and side streets to arterials, which means people are being routed up and over a lot of hills.

    So– directions are a little wonky, not the way I’d go that is most direct and safe (the directions for the reverse of my commute says to ride up McDonald– which I wouldn’t do even if you paid me!) but at least show you some options.

    Drag and reposition route works well.

    The bicycling layer seems to stop where Hall runs across hwy 217, and doesn’t include anything in Tigard besides the Fanno Creek Trail. For LO, it only includes the Tryon Creek Trail.

    Do they have plans to expand this feature out into the surrounding towns? It makes it look like Portland is a bicycling island surrounded by hostile waters. Which it isn’t in reality.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Refunk March 10, 2010 at 9:36 am

    So, like, in relation to longer routing (touring or other longer trip applications) that whole speed thing could be resolved simply by Google showing it as total hours rather than days and fractions thereof. Few humans ride their bike in whole-day increments, 24 hours or more in a row (and you randonneurs know who you are), so showing hours would simplify calculation for travel logistics.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • K'Tesh March 10, 2010 at 9:56 am

    Tested it from home to work… made a correction, it had me turn left at SW Allen (from Lombard), I made a correction. Turn left at SW Denny instead.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Kt March 10, 2010 at 10:22 am

    For those of us who don’t watch youtube at work, would someone please explain the difference between solid green roads and dashed green roads?


    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jessica Roberts March 10, 2010 at 10:53 am

    Hi Jonathan – I’d love for you to find out where/how is Google getting source data and will they work towards a national standard input format like GTFS for transit?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • DS March 10, 2010 at 10:54 am

    It’s working now for Vancouver, WA, but I don’t entirely agree with it’s choices. Going from downtown Vancouver to Troutdale it suggests crossing the I-5 bridge to Marine Drive and cutting south at 138th. That’s probably a little flatter than riding to the 205 bridge and then following Marine Drive the rest of the way past the Troutdale airport, but it’s definitely not what I would choose given lights, traffic, and dealing with the I-5 bridge.

    On the plus side, it has finally realized you can go through Delta Park on Whitaker to get to the I-5 crossing and Marine Drive. The walking directions never allowed that.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Kaeta March 10, 2010 at 10:55 am

    So the bike lanes and green markings end just as Portland becomes Beaverton and it gave me weird routes that ignore all the great lanes that Beavertron and Hillsboro have added over the years, but I sent a “Report Problem” to Google to let then know about the bike lanes that I use on a daily basis. I’ll report if they get back to me about that.

    I’m stoked about this and I hope that they mine all of us for “Best Routes” because that would just make this feature so awesome. Yay!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor) March 10, 2010 at 11:04 am

      folks.. i’m hearing all your questions. I did a Q&A with Google guy that I’ll publish as soon as I can get to it.. thanks.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • DS March 10, 2010 at 10:58 am

    Oh, and it thinks everyone should use only the east span of the Interstate (I-5) bridge. The path on the west span isn’t shown, nor is the path to it from Columbia in Vancouver.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Eric March 10, 2010 at 11:07 am

    Cool, wonder if this will show up on the maps on my iPhone?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Sarah Chino March 10, 2010 at 11:35 am

    must have taken them forever! either way, i’m happy 🙂

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Troy March 10, 2010 at 11:35 am

    I plugged in my route (N Rosa Parks to SW 5th and Alder) and it did pretty well. However, I think it sent me to an intersection that I can’t legally turn right at (NE Broadway and NE Vancouver). I tend to veer off on Russell and come down parallel near Lillis-Albina. Cool feature though!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • h March 10, 2010 at 11:36 am

    I will just stick with paper maps.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • f5 March 10, 2010 at 11:36 am

    So far it’s pretty clueless about SW portland…you’d think it would at the very least be aware of what the major cycling arteries are in Bike City USA (barbur, terwilleger). But alas, it sends me down Taylors Ferry to Macadam.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Anne Hawley March 10, 2010 at 11:49 am

    Jonathan, this is fantastic, and I’m really impressed that you’re communicating directly with Google.

    So, let me just add my big wish to the wish list: Car driving directions should get an enhancement:

    And voilà! Drivers and cyclists would start to self-segregate. I think that would be awesome.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Anne Hawley March 10, 2010 at 11:50 am

    Um, apparently the img tag isn’t allowed here, so here’s my pictured enhancement: Driving instruction option for “fewest bikes”:

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • A.K. March 10, 2010 at 12:14 pm

    Amos #44:

    I agree, though it did a good job in one of my “pet peeve” areas, which is NE 7th Ave between Fremont and Broadway.

    When going South, which is downhill most of the way, 7th is a nice bike route because it contains only stop. However, going North is uphill, which is much slower going (obviously). I always opt for riding North on 8th or 9th Ave, which is what Google recommends, so I can be slow without the speeding cars right next to me…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • brettoo March 10, 2010 at 12:30 pm

    Haven’t had a chance to try it yet, but wondering how it compares to my old reliable, and also wondering — this is probably another story — what’s going on with that site, since it says there’s been no major update for awhile. From what I’m hearing in the above comments, I’ll probably be plotting my routes via both methods for awhile.

    And yes, I too would love to know if and when we’ll eventually be able get this info on iPhones and other mobile devices via a special app, standard website, etc.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John Lascurettes March 10, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    For those of us who don’t watch youtube at work, would someone please explain the difference between solid green roads and dashed green roads?

    According to the video:
    Dark green are off-street routes
    Light green are on-street bike lanes
    Dotted green are “other” recommended routes

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jim Hook March 10, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    This is great!

    I’ve used the feedback mechanism to report a couple of missing bike/ped bridges (Tualatin near Cook park, Union St. in Salem).

    Recommended feature: Road Surface. Paved vs. gravel is very important. I just asked for a route from Newberg to Neskowin via Nestucca River Rd. I think it picked a route that has more gravel than is necessary.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • bikesalot March 10, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    It did a reasonable job on my commuting route from PCC Sylvania to up above Cedar Mill. The distance was close to my morning route (I go much longer in the afternoon to avoid traffic). It did route me off some main roads that I use and onto others that I do not use. Will need to try a few longer routes to get a better overall feel, but this IS good news!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Bruce H March 10, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    It is turned on for Houston, Texas. I have not tested to see how well it works, but I do know that not all routes are in yet. Specifically, the new bike path through the Heights is not shown.

    Google does have an excellent history of constant improvement in newly released products, particularly popular ones, so I’m going to take a wait and see approach to this. I do think this feature has huge potential.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • OnTheRoad March 10, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    The route recommended from SE 20th & Division to Johns Landing would take you over the Ross Island Bridge.


    Are you sure they had bicycles in mind?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • are March 10, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    just fed a route i am used to doing into both google and bycycle, got a much better result with bycycle. plus one to comment 24 on choosing knott over broadway. similar mistaken choices throughout the google route, some of which i admit are subtleties.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • DS March 10, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    Bycycle seems to have some good information, but it also ends at the state line, making it not as useful if you live in Vancouver. It won’t even let me force a route to anywhere north of Jantzen Beach; it just acts like there’s no map there.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Paul March 10, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    I wonder what the chances are of getting little off-street connector pathways and “unofficial” routes like Riverview Cemetery added.

    In terms of the little off-street connectors, for instance, there’s a path that connects SW 66th to 217/Kruse Way near my office in the Tigard Triangle area that doesnt appear, re-routing you down to Bonita in order to get around the 217/I-5 interchange.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • KeithDarlow March 10, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    Super! It still some bugs to work out. I come to NW Portland via Broadway. It wants me to turn right and go a block out of my way near the bridge instead of just continuing down Broadway and onto the bridge. I will be using this A LOT! Especially in unfamiliar cities.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • PDXcyclist March 10, 2010 at 5:01 pm

    I’m at the very outer edge of Portland, at the border with Tigard. It gave me the exact route I take on my commute which is nice.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • […] to to learn more. Previous coverage of this story here (with lots of informative comments) and […]

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Paul Johnson March 11, 2010 at 6:54 pm

    This just seems sub-par given the state of and

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • […] I might not be so crazy to think that Google Maps could have had that much of an influence already. Here’s the League of American Bicyclists’ Andy Clarke: It is a game-changer, especially for those short trips that are the most polluting… This new tool […]

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Sandra May 13, 2010 at 11:55 am

    Don’t they have walking directions too? Or was I dreaming that up :-p This is great I’m glad Google can come up with unique ways of providing valuable information for all walks of life.

    Recommended Thumb up 0