Support BikePortland - Journalism that Matters

Doored? The law is on your side (but that might not be enough)

Posted by on April 22nd, 2014 at 9:20 am

door zone warning stencil-10

(Photo J. Maus/BikePortland)

If you ever have the unfortunate luck of coming into conflict with another road user, it’s always a pleasure to find out the law is in your favor.

Usually, conflicts on the road relate to the question of who has the right to the same space at the same time. Having someone open their car door into you — a.k.a. getting “doored” — falls into this category. Usually a motor vehicle operator fails to see a bicycle rider and opens a door so close to their path that a collision or near-miss occurs. While defensive riding can go a long way toward avoiding this sometimes painful encounter, sometimes there is just nothing a rider can do — everything happens too fast.

Fortunately, this is one of those areas where the law is on the side of the bicycle rider. Here’s the relevant section of Oregon’s Vehicle Code (remember bicycles are “vehicles” too) that prohibits opening the door of any vehicle unless it is reasonably safe to do so:

ORS 811.490: Improper opening or leaving open of vehicle door; penalty. (1) A person commits the offense of improper opening or leaving open a vehicle door if the person does any of the following:

    (a) Opens any door of a vehicle unless and until it is reasonably safe to do so and it can be done without interference with the movement of traffic, or with pedestrians and bicycles on sidewalks or shoulders.

    (b) Leaves a door open on the side of a vehicle available to traffic, or to pedestrians or bicycles on sidewalks or shoulders for a period of time longer than necessary to load or unload passengers.

(2) The offense described in this section, improper opening or leaving open a vehicle door, is a Class D traffic infraction.

The scheduled bail amount for a Class D Traffic Infraction is $110.00, and the fine is the same. Note that the law makes it illegal not only to open the door when it interferes with people trying to get by, but it is also illegal to leave the door open longer than necessary to load or unload passengers.

One would think that the law is so clear-cut that disputes over who was at fault would never arise. Unfortunately that’s not the case.

From my experience investigating these cases, the motor vehicle driver is apologetic and completely willing to accept blame at the scene (in spite of the advice on many insurance identification cards which state, “do not accept fault for the accident”). But, by the time the motor vehicle operator thinks about it and talks to an insurance adjuster or attorney, their view of what happened suddenly changes.

The revised version goes something like this:

“I opened my car door with plenty of distance behind me for the approaching bicyclist to see it. If the bicyclist had been paying attention, he or she would have seen that my door was open and ridden around it. Since I only intended to have the door open long enough to get out of the car, the accident is mostly the fault of the bicyclist.”

Believe it or not, this argument is enough to inject a note of comparative negligence on the part of the person operating a bicycle into the equation in most cases.

The percentage of comparative fault works out to a pro rata reduction in the amount of damages, so the effect is significant. Add the fact that most of the members of any jury will identify primarily with the motor vehicle operator, not the bicycle rider, and you have a recipe for disappointment. Remember, under Oregon’s system of comparative fault, if a jury decides that the motor vehicle operator was partly at fault for opening the car door (less than 50%) but the person riding a bicycle was mostly at fault (more than 50%) for failing to pay close enough attention and to make a reasonable effort to avoid striking the open door, then the person riding the bicycle loses in court — even though the person operating the motor vehicle violated the vehicle code by his or her own admission.

I’ve found that in almost every car door collision case the person operating the motor vehicle is primarily at fault. However, it is essential in every case that the person riding the bicycle carefully remember and reconstruct the scene of the incident to demonstrate that there was not enough time to take necessary evasive action in order to avoid hitting the door. Usually, bicycle riders relate that things just happened too fast and there was simply not enough time to avoid the car door.

While it’s nice to have the law on your side, you also need to be prepared to make your case to an insurance adjuster. Knowing, and being ready to present in advance, Oregon’s law and a mental reconstruction of how the collision happened will prepare you to make a successful insurance claim.

Ray Thomas
(Photo © J. Maus/BikePortland)

This article is part of our monthly legal series with Portland-based lawyer and bike law expert Ray Thomas of Swanson, Thomas, Coon & Newton. (Disclaimer: STC&N is a BikePortland advertiser and this article is part of a paid promotional partnership.)

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. BikePortland is an inclusive company with no tolerance for discrimination or harassment including expressions of racism, sexism, homophobia, or xenophobia. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

38
Leave a Reply

avatar
16 Comment threads
22 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
27 Comment authors
AnnPdxPhoenixSpiffyareTom Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
John Liu
Guest
John Liu

I’ve learned to:
– Watch for heads or movement through the rear window of the parked cars as you approach.
– Ride on or near the left edge of the bike lane when possible, ride in the traffic lane when necessary.
– At night, use a helmet-mounted light to look for people about to open doors and to alert them to your approach.

jonno
Guest
jonno

Lately I’ve found myself riding on the left edge of or just outside the bike lane when there are lots of cars to the right, specifically to avoid the doors (in fact I saw a near-dooring on Broadway this morning). Could I potentially face a ticket for this behavior?

El Biciclero
Guest
El Biciclero

Your Honor, I’d like to call GoPro to the stand…Now Mr. GoPro, you’ve been sworn; could you just show us events as they actually happened, to the best of your digital recollection?

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

I’ve given up on trying to predict when doors are going to open. I just hug the white line and stay clear of the door zone. I’d rather get clipped by a car going 10mph faster than me on my left, then get creamed by a car door on my right at 15-20mph. The drivers on the left are more likely to be paying attention to you, because you are right in their field of vision.

Troy Haliwell
Guest
Troy Haliwell

In Washington, we who ride bikes have all the same rights, rules, responsibilities, and access that automobile drivers have. In fact, we can ride any and all state highways and freeways except for certain stretches of the busiest ones with the most potential for accidents (See list at http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/bike/closed.htm).

This means in door cases, both parties stand to be at fault should both show negligence.

Steve Brown
Guest
Steve Brown

How about a Portland Police sting? Have police hire riders in high door traffic areas, cite, fine and show it on the news. This is what will happen when you open a car door in a bike lane. My guess is there will be a rolling stop sting before this happens.

AndyC of Linnton
Guest
AndyC of Linnton

I was about to suggest that maybe we put up some signs in certain areas warning of door zones and people exiting cars not paying attention, but then realized that if you ride a bike you probably already know and travel like no-one in a car is paying attention to any other road user.
Thanks for the article, I hope to never be in need of referencing it.

Joe
Guest
Joe

broadway is door zone fest 🙁 but how about cars that see parking spot to only zip passed and turn right even if you going well on a bike. some fokes will leave door open to step right into bike lane.. agh simple fix just always look before opening 🙂 oh and sharing is awesome

Scott H
Guest
Scott H

This is a great series.

Charley Gee
Guest

When I learned this it totally changed the way I open my car door. Such a simple concept to teach and use:

“Dutch drivers are taught that when you are about to get out of the car, you reach for the door handle with your right hand — bringing your arm across your body to the door. This forces a driver to swivel shoulders and head, so that before opening the door you can see if there is a bike coming from behind.” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/31/opinion/sunday/the-dutch-way-bicycles-and-fresh-bread.html?_r=0

dan
Guest
dan

“I opened my car door with plenty of distance behind me for the approaching bicyclist to see it. If the bicyclist had been paying attention, he or she would have seen that my door was open and ridden around it. Since I only intended to have the door open long enough to get out of the car, the accident is mostly the fault of the bicyclist.”

So wrong, you admit knowingly breaking the law and that reduces your % responsibility?

Bike Commuter
Guest
Bike Commuter

I never ride in the door zone. On streets that do not have a bike lane I take the lane. When biking in a bike lane, i am always careful and if necessary I move into the lane to avoid situations where a door may open. Dodging an opening door may put you under the wheels of a car in the lane. This is particularly important when there are a lot of parked delivery vehicles as many open their door and can’t see anyone. I can’t duck that fast. When a bike lane is narrow such as along Broadway SW I find a different street if at all possible and go into the lane when there are parked vehicles especially near the hotels.

Taking the lane also has the advantage that you don’t have to worry so much about right hooks. If you look, PBOT recommends that you take the lane especially downtown. Now all we need to do is get the drivers who think you are wrong and who run up behind you, honk their horn, rev their engines, and then pass unacceptably close. I had a garbage truck do that this past week, and he almost clipped a car in doing so as he paid no attention to anything else on the road. Not that this got him anywhere, I was behind him and held up by him until he turned off.

davemess
Guest
davemess

I really hate Comparative Fault.

mabsf
Guest
mabsf

In my experience driver are more careful in busy streets because they don’t want to loose their doors to passing cars…
Now, side street and separated bike lanes are a different game:
– Rush hour on side streets is whack-the-cyclist: everybody is happy to be finally home, opens the door, then gathers their stuff…
– I wish car makers would extend their dead-angle warning to bikes and make lights on the car doors a standard issue…

On the separated bike ways you have to fight with the passengers who are relatively unused to careful door opening… that why I HATE the separated bike lane on Broadway…

…and while dooring isn’t bad enough – my big fear is to be hit by the following car while I am laying stunned on the street…

Jen
Guest
Jen

Make sure the police check the driver’s license and insurance at the scene, if you are able. I was doored by a someone without insurance, or a license. A lawyer discovered this later. The police didn’t ask at the scene. I went to the hospital in an ambulance. A bystander got the name and number of the driver and handed it to me. I called for weeks, but the driver didn’t answer her phone. I didn’t get compensation for my destroyed bike or medical bills. The driver got off without even a ticket.

Tom
Guest
Tom

I’ve been doored. After one, I inquired with my insurance co. about what I need to do to claim damages, and was advised to file a police report at the time of the incident. So, next time I was doored I remembered that and called the Police. They would not send an officer to the scene unless I required medical attention, which I didn’t (though the next day, I regretted that when the pain set in).

I’m not sure if I was given bad advice, but I was surprised that PDX Police wouldn’t respond.