The Classic - Cycle Oregon

Bike Science: Keeping the rubberside down

Posted by on October 26th, 2010 at 1:35 pm

Slip or grip?
(Photo © J. Maus)

[This is our latest Bike Science column by Shawn Small. Read previous entries here.]

With cyclocross season in full swing and the rainy season upon us, it’s likely that tires have become a part of your bike gear conversations of late. And it’s no surprise; tires have a huge impact not just on the quality of your ride, but on whether you get home in one piece.

So let’s talk about tires.

Traction — the fundamental reason we have tires — is defined as “…a physical process in which a tangential force is transmitted across an interface between two bodies through dry friction or an intervening fluid film resulting in motion, stoppage or the transmission of power.” Or, put another way, it’s the frictional force that holds you and your bike to the ground.

(Graphic: Schwalbe)

The place where that frictional force happens is known as the contact patch.

When you sit on your bike the tires deform (squish) under your weight. This squish is also known as the contact patch. The area of the contact patch is equal to the weight load divided by the air pressure. While it seems counter-intuitive, here’s why big, fat, and wide tires roll better (explained by Schwalbe themselves, and yes, it has to do with contact patch):

“Because of the longer flattened area of the narrow tire, the wheel loses more of its “roundness” and produces more deformation during rotation. However, in the wide tire, the radial length of the flattened area is shorter, making the tire “rounder” and so it rolls better.”

And now for some homework: Here’s the formula to find out the area of your contact patch:


    A: is the area of the contact patch (inch2)
    W: is the combined weight of the bike and the rider (lbs)
    P: is the tire pressure (pounds/inch2)
W / P = A

For example, the combined weight of me and my bike is 200 lbs. and I run my tires at 90 psi. Therefore…

200 (lbs) / 90 (lbs/in) = 2.22 inch2

This equates to roughly 2.22 inch2 of total contact patch. Then divide that by 2 (two tires) and you have approximately 1.11 inch2 of tire contact patch per tire (Note: the rear tire sees approximately 60% of the total weight while the front sees approximately 40% during normal riding conditions this equates to a rear contact patch of 1.33 inch2 for the rear and 0.89 inch2 for the front tire).

Twilight Criterium-23

Tire, tread, and pressure choice
mean even more when racing.

Now that we’ve tackled contact patch, what about the tread pattern that is doing the contacting?

With all the rain we’re getting, have you ever thought you might hydroplane while riding through a puddle? While a tire tread pattern is important for cars to shed water to prevent hydroplaning, the same hydroplaning effects are not realistic for a bicycle due to the rounded tires and considerably higher tire pressure.
NASA (yes, NASA) has done testing to determine the critical speeds to hydroplane a vehicle. They found that it is primarily based upon the tire pressure and can be simplified by this equation. Where,

    V: critical speed in knots (1 knot = 1.15mph)
    P: tire pressure (pounds/inch2)

A tire with a low pressure of 30 psi would require a speed of approximately 57 mph to hydroplane, and a tire at 90 psi would require a speed of approximately 98 mph. These speeds aren’t really attainable for a bicycle under normal conditions (Zoobombing notwithstanding).

Even with hydroplaning out of the question, have you ever wondered if the grooves and patterns on tires are really necessary? After all, some people get by with nearly 100% slick tires.

When it comes to bicycling, we’ve basically got two operating surfaces. Either the ground is hard and smoother than the inflated tire (e.g. pavement, concrete, etc.), or the ground is softer and bumpier than the inflated tire (e.g. sand, dirt, mud, etc.).

On test: The Electra Amsterdam

On smooth paved roads traction is generated primarily by the rubber compound of the tire. Softer rubber compounds tend to grip better and increase the traction for accelerating, turning, and braking. But softer tires comes with a cost — they don’t last as long and they are less puncture resistant.

On the road, slick or smooth tires provide better grip than ones with tread patterns or grooves. Why? Because a slick tire maximizes the contact patch surface area of the tire with the ground. The grooves or tread patterns on road tires are put on primarily for cosmetic reasons.

However, on soft, bumpy ground the tread pattern and grooves on the tire are crucial to increase the traction forces. When the ground is soft the tire knobs actually dig into the surface and interlock it — like a cog and a chain — providing an increase in traction and handling. The stiffer and harder the knobs are the more they dig into the ground, this is why metal studs work so well.

Now that you know a bit more about tires, the next time someone tells you to, “Keep the rubberside down!” you’ll have some science to help you do it.

Check out these links and PDFs to learn more:

— Bike Science is sponsored by: – GPS cycling, virtual competitions and detailed ride analysis.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

  • Skid October 26, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    So how about some tire recommendations for Portland streets and weather?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Spiffy October 26, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    I always assumed narrow tires were faster… of course they don’t factor in wind resistance… but I never go over 25mph anyways…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dave October 26, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    @Spiffy: actually, in typical road conditions, narrow, high pressure tires can be slower, because you lose more forward momentum over bumpy surfaces (they bounce up more).

    I’ve really liked the Schwalbe Marathons – fairly wide, I run them at about 65psi, and a good mix of fairly smooth down the middle of the tire, with more tread along the sides. Never had any traction issues with them (but I also ride relatively slow).

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mello yello October 26, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    we’re not talking about weight of the tire right? because narrower tires are lighter and accelerate quicker, and can be inflated to higher pressures…i’d rather go with the fatter tire at lower pressure in slick conditions though…for the increased contact patch while cornering…bikeforums love the vectran gp4000S by continental, though pricey at retail…polyx gpS are the same compound at half the price(and maybe half the flat protection)

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR October 26, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    so which tires do best on pavement covered in wet mushy leaves?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Andrew Kreps October 26, 2010 at 2:09 pm

    I first heard that saying in reference to motorcycling, where it’s important to keep the rubber side down, and the shiny side up. I would have liked to see some more science around wet-weather braking techniques, and why it’s even more important in the rain & leaves to use your front brake effectively. I feel there’s a lot of mystery and avoidance of the front brake, when that is what will keep you safe.

    Another important item about friction, and available traction, is that you only have so much of it. You use up traction while accelerating, braking and turning. If you’re in a turn and you try to brake, you can easily run out of our favorite coefficient and start sliding sideways. Brake before your turn, not in it, and straighten out before you hammer the pedals. Squeeze progressively on the brake. Never grab.

    Unless you’re like me, and you enjoy fishtailing your Big Dummy through the wet leaves to leave a bit more traction for the next rider. You’re welcome, folks. 🙂

    p.s. For the inevitable tire thread, I’ve had excellent wet and dry experiences both with Specialized Armadillo Elites 700Cx23 on my road bike, and Schwalbe Marathon Supreme 2.1’s on the Big Dummy. Flat-proof-ness cannot be overvalued.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mello yello October 26, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    while we’re at it let’s also mention brake pads…koolstop salmon pink colored pads are the standard for wet weather riding…and they won’t sand down your rims like normal compounds…koolstop is based in lake oswego…

    on wet cornering…put as much weight on the outer pedal to lower your center of gravity…whatever you do, don’t yank the handlebars inside mid corner to tighten up a turn…that’s how falls occur…do most of your braking in a straight line before a corner

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Harald October 26, 2010 at 2:11 pm

    The explanation about wide tires running better leaves out one oh so important detail: Yes, in principle it is correct that a wide tire will run better than a more narrow one. However, this is based on the assumption (as we can easily see in the formula) that the tires are run at the same pressure. And you won’t (and shouldn’t) run a 57 mm Schwalbe Big Apple at the same pressure as a 23 mm racing tire.

    So by all means, get wide tires. They’re more comfy and you won’t have any issues with pinch flats. But don’t assume that they’re going to make you faster.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Becky October 26, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    Did the hydroplaning equation get lost?

    Thanks for a great writeup.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mello yello October 26, 2010 at 2:14 pm


    big dummy skidding! I ride my tandem(sans passenger) in the wet for the increased stability of having the rear wheel way out behind you…bikes with longer wheelbase slide really slow compared to normal bikes so ample warning before a fall…yeah, ride a tandem you big dummy

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Ed October 26, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    BURR: as far as I know, nothing. Same is true of wet metal or paint.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Over and Doubt October 26, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    mello, it ain’t the brake pads themselves that wear down your rims; it’s the constant spray of gritty water from the wet road, coating both rims and pads and acting as an abrasive slurry. Kool-Stop salmon are good, but they can’t prevent road spray.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mello yello October 26, 2010 at 2:38 pm

    true…but in the dry the salmon koolstops won’t wear down your rims like black pads

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Daniel October 26, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    I often see people with single speed, non-coaster brake bikes which just have a front hand brake.

    Could this be the solution to fishtailing?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mello yello October 26, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    also a fixed gear lets the rider feel traction in the wet and can slow the bike down without hand brakes…they’re also cheaper to maintain instead of having to remove road gunk from a shifting drive-train…no expensive shifters to corrode up either

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • beth h October 26, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    Great article, and timely too. Thank you!

    For riding on pavement covered with wet leaves, there is no ideal tire, though I’ve had good results with both the 26 x 1.75 Schwalbe Marathon and the 26 x 1.5 Panaracer Pasela. I run both at less-than full pressure year-round, and go a little lower still when the conditions are less than optimal.

    As for the front brake — for most folks it is one of the most under-utilized parts of the bike. Which is a shame, because it can provide up to 70% of the bike’s stopping power. Learn to use the front brake more — give yourself more distance and time to stop so you can learn to ease into the front brake, then overlap with gradual pressure on the rear.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dave October 26, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    #14 Daniel, no that’s the solution to overpopulation. I love seeing people who copied the “fixie” look with no rear brake, and then realized they missed coasting and slapped a freewheel on the back. Genius.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR October 26, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    @ #12: Brake pads can and do wear down your rims. Over the last ten years I have purchased two new bikes that came with Shimano brake pads marked ‘for alloy rims’. These brake pads are actually manufactured with little bits of aluminum imbedded in the rubber and you can actually hear them destroying your rims when you brake.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • shirtsoff October 26, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    “[NASA] found that it is primarily based upon the tire pressure and can be simplified by this equation.”

    Where is this equation?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • jeff October 26, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    Dave #3, I know a few pro riders who would strongly disagree with you about tire size.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • buglas October 26, 2010 at 4:27 pm

    For those hunting the hydroplaning equation, follow the NASA link – it’s on page 5: V = 9 * P^.5

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • 3-speeder October 26, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    The V vs. p equation seems missing in the post.

    I looked up the reference (given at the end of the post) and I believe the missing equation is on p. 5, eqn (4):

    V = 9 * sqrt(p)

    where p is in lb/(sq in)
    and V is in knots.

    This fits the two examples given in the post – remember to convert knots to mph (1 knot = 1.15 mph is mentioned in the post) to verify the example numbers given.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Shawn Small October 26, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    When it is wet out, leaves, painted sections of the road, sewer covers, metal grates all can be slick and as pointed out by other commentors, take it slow and brake before you go into the turn.

    jeff #20 and Dave #3
    Microjumping of high-pressure tires is a new topic of study and discussion. I haven’t been able to find any analytical data supporting either side of it yet though.

    @Harald #8
    You are spot on with your comment. I am playing with a wider rim/skinny high-pressure tire combination to see if I can measure any rolling resistance differences.

    @mello yello @Over and Doubt
    I am going to try and get Kool-Stop on board for a brake pad overview to help understand all the different compounds and verbiage.

    -Shawn Small

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Loren October 26, 2010 at 6:02 pm

    I run Panaracer tires, and have had very good luck with them. Ruffy Tuffys and T-Serv Protex. I have also had pretty good luck with Continental Gatorskins, and 4 Seasons. Conti’s have gotten a little expensive though, and I think Panaracer is every bit as good, if not better. Check out biketiresdirect here in portland, they’re a great shop and have great prices!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • CaptainKarma October 26, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    The bike in the banner photo makes me feel like I had too much tequila…you know, all inside out and backward feeling…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Pete October 26, 2010 at 6:27 pm

    Ed (#11): Definitely right about wet metal! I’ve got a Ti collarbone to show for it. This was in very light rain on 25mm Conti 4000S inflated to ~105. Otherwise they’ve been great, but I notice my Conti 4K and Gators lost softness fairly quickly. I’ve heard Schwalbe’s raved about for wet weather in many bike shops, including several where they were a less expensive option. Getting ready to pick up a set to throw on the winter wheels…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • bikieboy October 26, 2010 at 7:06 pm

    as Spock was wont to say, fascinating!

    but i’m a bit confused – doesn’t the actual tire width figure in the equation calculating the contact patch? If so, I don’t see it.
    area of your contact patch:
    A: is the area of the contact patch (inch2)
    W: is the combined weight of the bike and the rider (lbs)
    P: is the tire pressure (pounds/inch2)

    W / P = A

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • bikieboy October 26, 2010 at 7:10 pm

    i guess this is what is not making sense to me:

    “Because of the longer flattened area of the narrow tire, the wheel loses more of its “roundness” and produces more deformation during rotation. However, in the wide tire, the radial length of the flattened area is shorter, making the tire “rounder” and so it rolls better.”

    i really don’t understand why this would be so. And yes, i can be obtuse, i know.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Patrick October 26, 2010 at 7:11 pm

    I thought the article was interesting and insightful but was surprised that there was no discussion of the difference between static and kinetic friction. Static friction refers to the traction between objects that are NOT sliding, and kinetic friction the traction when they are sliding. The static friction force is higher, which is why your stopping distance will be shorter if you brake smoothly at the threshold of your traction without skidding (skidding means you’re using kinetic friction which generates less force).

    Friction itself is created by “coldwells,” which are microscopic valleys and peaks on the surface of objects that run into one another as objects slide. If you think of non-sliding objects as having these peaks and valleys interlocked, you can understand why static friction is greater than kinetic friction. Once you exceed static friction you’re out of the rut and sliding becomes easier. Knobby tires exaggerate this effect and make it visible, providing edges and corners on the tire surface to grip the travel surface just like the microscopic coldwells.

    I also remember doing an experiment in high school physics class where we verified that total grip is not affected by contact area when the coefficient of friction and weight (or normal force) stay the same (because the force per area increases as the contact area decreases).

    Also, as noted in Post 6, when cornering the total grip of your tire is divided two forces, one in the direction of travel and the other perpendicular to the direction of travel (aligned radially to the turn). The hypotenuse formed by these orthogonal vectors is equal to the total grip of the tire. Thus, when you corner it is easier to exceed the grip (static friction) in either the forward or perpendicular direction, resulting in a fish tail. Putting your weight on the outside pedal simply shifts your weight to increase the normal force on the road and the total available grip.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • James October 26, 2010 at 7:28 pm

    I like to run secret tires, with an unkowable contact patch/pressure rating. I find that this gives me the best ratio of performance to safey while keeping me one step ahead of wankish blog hounds. It’s also true that no tire can take the place of good judgement when facing winter riding conditions.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Ed October 26, 2010 at 7:33 pm

    Hi bikieboy:

    One way to think of it, is the 2d size of the contact patch for the narrow tire and wide tire are about the same for a given pressure.

    In the narrow tire, the contact patch is oval shaped: narrower, longer, and deeper than the more round contact patch of the wider tire.

    Tire rolling resistance comes from the bending of the rubber walls of the tire, since the narrow tire deforms more in a deeper indentation than the wide tire, the walls bends more than in the wider tire.

    There is a similar story for tires on smaller diameter wheels. A 20 inch bmx or 26 inch mountain tire will have very slightly more rolling resistance than a 27 inch road tire at the same width and tire pressure.

    Not that tire rolling resistance matters much in the big picture.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • GI Phil October 26, 2010 at 9:11 pm

    how about a story on knowing how to crash? as long as you are riding you will eventually crash and so many people are terrified of it. I was too, then i learned to love it! Sliding out in the wet leaves is hilarious, and frequently less painful than crashing dry.

    Once you learn to crash, then you can learn to bike without fear. and knowing is half the battle.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • resopmok October 26, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    Which tires operate well on wet roads aside, I prefer the flat protection provided by Schwalbe Marathon Plus (used to be called Smartguard). 2 x 28mm on my winter commuter at 80 PSI has served me reliably for the past five years, attaining a grand total of three flats which were all caused by stray screws and nails going through the sidewall. Not having to deal with flats in the rain is always preferable.

    It’s easy to shoot down a fixie rider but #15 has a good point about the control a fixie gives in extremely slick conditions. A front brake becomes useless when even the lightest application will lock up the front wheel, leaving you without directional control and balance (and on the ground). By being able to feel with your muscles that point of maximum friction before the rear wheel locks up, you can provide optimal stopping power without endangering your safety. This is keeping in mind of course that your stopping distance is probably 3-4x or greater than normal. As an anecdote, I got caught in freezing fog a few years ago on my way to the Beaverton/Aloha area from downtown during early morning hours. Though the roads were empty, they were unexpectedly covered in ice and I was happy to be riding a fixie which was my main squeeze at the time. After a crash rather abruptly alerted me to the ice’s presence, I was able to ditch the front brake and make it home safe, albeit slow.

    On my other bike I run 23mm at about 130 PSI, but it only goes out on sunny, dry days when I have a hankering for going fast.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Ted Buehler October 26, 2010 at 11:10 pm

    Thanks for an informative article — one comment:

    “The grooves or tread patterns on road tires are put on primarily for cosmetic reasons.”

    Um, any city rider will encounter plenty of sketch conditions that will put their road tire tread to work —
    * loose gravel (construction sites, de-icing)
    * manhole covers and sewer drains — need the treat to catch on the iron nubs when you’re turning, otherwise you’ll slip out)
    * leaves (need the grooves to let your tire’s rubber catch on the underlying pavement texture)
    * rutted pavement, where studded tires have destroyed the driving surface you ride on slick pebbles embedded in concrete, need all the texture you can get in wet weather.

    Ted Buehler

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Over and Doubt October 27, 2010 at 12:42 am

    BURR #18: I’ve seen the metal flecks and heard the grinding myself, just as you reported–but those flecks most likely were grit-ground off your own rim and got stuck in the pads. Haven’t seen a metal-content pad (for rim brakes) since the “sinterized” Modolos that young Greg Lemond made cool for a while.

    How’d the flecks get there already on new bikes? IDK. Test rides on wet days, maybe.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Alan October 27, 2010 at 3:18 am

    Beth H #16: 70% is a nice, round number for typical front-brake effectiveness of a good rider under normal, relaxed riding conditions. When you say “it can provide up to…” then the figure becomes 100%, as in a “stoppie” or extreme braking with rear-wheel lift-off. Anyway, agreed that front brakes rock.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Ron October 27, 2010 at 7:28 am


    That’s a great article, with some good insights. I’d include this link at the end:

    This one provides some excellent advice for finding your own perfect tire pressure.

    Happy Trails,
    Ron G.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Christopher October 27, 2010 at 8:58 am

    Vittoria Rrandonneur – First choice. Reflective sidewalls, Great tread, Durable

    Panasonic RiBMO – Second choice.
    Great shape, very tacky, a little heavy – but very durable

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • El Biciclero October 27, 2010 at 9:51 am

    Go Phil!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Albyn October 27, 2010 at 9:53 am

    OK, my contact patch on the road bike
    (210 combined weight, 115psi) is

    > 210/115
    [1] 1.826087

    My contact patch on the Mtn bike (at least 5 lbs heavier, at 55psi)

    > 215/55
    [1] 3.909091

    yep, less rolling resistance on the road bike.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dabby October 27, 2010 at 10:01 am


    700×25 German made Continental Grand Prix’s……..

    Nuff said.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dabby October 27, 2010 at 10:05 am

    And the control one can get on a fixed gear in the rain is choice. Smoother than rim or disc braking. IMO
    Without a redundant brake.

    Like spreading butter on toast….

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Shawn Small October 27, 2010 at 11:21 am

    @bikieboy #27

    You can move the values around in the equation based on what you know for data.

    Since you know your total weight (W)lbs and your tire pressure (P)lbs/inch^2 you calculate (A) which is inch^2.

    If you wanted to roughly estimate the shape of your contact patch assume it has a rectangle shape. The area of a rectangle is calculated by the length times the width A = W*L. Now that we know our A value and the tire width (28 mm ~ 1.10 inch) we can estimate the L value.

    @Ed #31 perfectly explained with the 2d idea

    @Patrick #29
    sounds like you are a tribology fan!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • spare_wheel October 27, 2010 at 11:21 am

    @Ted Buehler
    Most commuter/road/touring tires don’t have enough tread to make much difference.

    At high speeds the stopping power of a hydraulic disc brake is far superior to anyones muscles.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR October 27, 2010 at 12:09 pm

    BURR #18: I’ve seen the metal flecks and heard the grinding myself, just as you reported–but those flecks most likely were grit-ground off your own rim and got stuck in the pads. Haven’t seen a metal-content pad (for rim brakes) since the “sinterized” Modolos that young Greg Lemond made cool for a while.

    How’d the flecks get there already on new bikes? IDK. Test rides on wet days, maybe.

    I’m sorry, but I’ve been told this before and you are wrong.

    I cleaned all 8 pads up after I removed them and examined them closely. There were large chunks of aluminum imbedded in the pads to a significant depth. It was definitely molded into the pads and not material from my rims or from the road.

    I’ve replaced them with normal rubber pads and the problem has definitely not reoccurred.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR October 27, 2010 at 12:12 pm

    As for the details, one of the bikes was a 2001 Batavus B1 hybrid and the other was a 2008 Dahon Vitesse.

    All 8 aluminized brake pads were marked ‘for alloy wheels’ and manufactured by Shitmano.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • KWW October 27, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    Here is another Jan Heine link from his blog:

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mello yello October 27, 2010 at 1:38 pm

    Car brake pads also have bits of steel embedded in them. Ceramic pads have copper. I heard the salmon koolstop pads have iron oxide(aka rust). It seems metal is necessary in any type of brake pad.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dabby October 27, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    At high speeds the stopping power of a hydraulic disc brake is far superior to anyones muscles.”

    Spare Wheel,
    It is not just about stopping power. well I mean it is if you are using a disc brake. Yank the lever, you’ll get stopped.

    But when you are using your leg as a brake as the direct drive allows you to do, it is more about modulation, or IMO applying what you need to, when you need to, to what you need to.

    You can feel in your legs, or more your whole body, what the tire, or more precisely, the contact patch, is doing on the street.

    And make any number of changes to that with
    minor or major changes to your attitude in relation to the bicycle.

    So, in conclusion, while the actual “stopping power” of a disc brake may be far superior to that of the leg, a disc brake in no way is superior to the leg, applied as a brake on a fixed gear, in terms of versatility.

    And versatility is what it takes to make it through a NW winter…..

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • j_ryde October 27, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    burr, you are wrong.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • j_ryde October 27, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    dabby, i have never ridden a fixed gear through the winter and i have managed to get through nw winters, ne winters and sw winters (both are worse than nw winters). anyway, brakes actuated with levers can also be set up to have modulation. in fact they should be. if your brake only has off and on options you should see your mechanic.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mello yello October 27, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    You can get through winter in shorts and a tee shirt too, but why make it harder on yourself?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dabby October 27, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    I understand that lever brakes have modulation.

    They do not modulate even close to as well however.

    I guess people read something, and take little bits of what they want out of it…

    Instead of just looking at other viable options than the norm.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mello yello October 27, 2010 at 7:07 pm

    If fixed gear was so bad, why did Sheldon Brown had 12 of them? One was a dedicated snow mtb. The rhythmic cadence of pedaling a fixed allows one to be intimately familiar with cadence so that an abrupt change indicates slippage. When slippage occurs the rider can immediately take steps to prevent a fall. Not so with geared bikes where the signs of slipping may be too mute or too late to take preventive action. Fixed transmits more traction feel from the legs that a geared bike, by nature, can not.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Over and Doubt October 27, 2010 at 11:01 pm

    mello: Oh definitely, disc brake pads generally have metal–whether for bikes, motorcycles, cars, etc. But that’s to match with disc brake rotors, which are hard steel.

    Rim-brake pads are different; they have to rub on soft aluminum.

    BURR: Quality rim-brake pads generally do have an underlying metal “skeleton” much as you describe, but I’m mystified why the pads would already be worn down so far on new bikes…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Skid October 28, 2010 at 8:41 am

    I’ll weigh in on the benefit of fixed in wet and slippery conditions. It is more than true that you can feel the slightest loss of traction with fixed, you feel it through the drivetrain and you adjust your cadence accordingly. Fixed gear is also awesome in the snow. I try to stay away from motorized analogies but it is like the difference between manual and automatic transmissions. Manuals are always better in slippery conditons. And fwiw I grew up in Massachusetts and lived in Minnepolis so I’ve ridden and driven plenty in the rain/snow/ice.

    I used to run 23c tires but I recently went to 28c and I think I ride a little faster. The lower pressure and wider section provide a less “vibey” and therefore less fatiguing ride.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mello yello October 28, 2010 at 10:03 am

    FWIW…automatic transmission can be controlled just like manual if you know how to left foot brake. Left foot braking requires practice to condition muscle memory not to treat the pedal as an on/off switch. Keeping the left foot slightly on the brake while modulating the gas with the right allows gingerly takeoff without sliding backwards.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR October 28, 2010 at 11:41 am

    @ #55 again, the pads had bits of aluminum molded into them, they were not worn down to the frame nor was the aluminum from my rim.

    lol @ jryde!


    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Over and Doubt October 28, 2010 at 9:00 pm

    Sorry BURR–I believe you believe what you’re saying, but I think you’re misinterpreting what you saw. For instance, what makes you think the bits were not from your rim (or at least, from *a* rim)? Got any pics, by chance?

    FWIW, I was a shop mechanic for ten years until the mid ’90s.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Robert Sloter October 28, 2010 at 9:05 pm

    I am new to Oregon but in Chicago one
    Problem was Slick streets after a long
    dry spell, this is mostly oil from cars.

    The first 2 weeks of rain should
    eliminate this problem here.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Cris F October 29, 2010 at 9:27 am

    Would love to see this analysis for mountain bike tires, 26″ vs. 29er. Is the contact patch formula independent of wheel size?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • GlowBoy October 29, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    Robert Sloter (#60), we have the same problem here, most years. Since we’ve had such a rainy fall slick streets aren’t a big problem.

    But most years, when the fall rains first hit after months without much rain, you’ll notice the streets are extremely slick for a few days. Combine that with drivers reacquainting themselves with driving in the rain, and crusty windshield wipers that need replacement, and the first couple weeks of the rainy season can be dicey indeed.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • GlowBoy October 29, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    I’m not going to argue whether “real” brakes or fixed gears are better for stopping your rear wheel.

    But your rear wheel has only about half the stopping power of your front wheel. I hope that those of you riding fixed gears will at least consider equipping your bikes with front brakes for the occasional panic stop, when you actually need to stop in a reasonable distance.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dabby October 29, 2010 at 12:46 pm


    Once again, front brake no need ugh.

    If you can’t panic stop without a redundant brake you should be riding another type of bike.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • GlowBoy October 29, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    … and, indeed, I *AM* riding another type of bike. Because I can’t panic stop using the rear wheel alone within what *I* consider a reasonable distance. And neither can you.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • El Biciclero October 29, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    Ahh. Here is another topic for scientific analysis: The few times I have been required to “panic stop” (mostly due to right hook situations), I have been most successful using what we used to call a “powerslide”: locking up the rear wheel and skidding sideways (which, by the way, looks way cooler on a “BMX” bike than on my “10-speed” commuter). Does this require more or less stopping distance than a front/rear brake panic squeeze while monitoring the wheels to avoid lockup? Granted, it requires a little extra lateral room to carry out, but to me it feels like it does a better job of getting me stopped and out of the way of danger faster.

    Follow-up topic: traction forces at work while braking.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • dabby October 29, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    Glow Boy,

    It is ok to just say you don’t know how to panic stop rear wheel alone, or that you just can’t imagine someone else can.

    But it is not ok to say it isn’t possible, when it clearly is possible. And when people, who are clearly alive and typing, say they have done it.

    I am sorry to have to say it, but the level of denial here just makes you look dumb.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Alan October 29, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    Maximum Deceleration–Panic Stops

    “The fastest that you can stop any bike of normal wheelbase is to apply the front brake so hard that the rear wheel is just about to lift off the ground. In this situation, the rear brake cannot contribute to stopping power, since it has no traction.”

    “…it takes twice as long to stop with the rear brake alone as with the front brake alone…”

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • are October 30, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    yes but sheldon brown is not talking about locking up the read wheel by stopping the drivetrain. an individual fixie rider either is or is not capable of this maneuver. if not, then yes, a “redundant” front brake would be appropriate.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • are October 30, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    “rear” for “read,” sorry

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Alan October 30, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    How does the type of brake refute the fact that a front brake alone stops about twice as fast as a rear brake alone?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Psyfalcon October 30, 2010 at 6:31 pm

    A skidding tire has less grip than a non skidding tire. Locking the rear will actually slow the bike more slowly than a rear tire at the threshold of loosing grip.

    I’ve also seen some fixie riders looking for easy to skid tires. That is, tires with less grip. That will both increase stopping distance, and make the bike harder to control in the wet.

    And then, a decent front brake will outperform all rear brakes. I would not like riding my bike with only a rear brake.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • resopmok October 30, 2010 at 11:51 pm

    The only time that a front brake will not stop you faster is when conditions are so slick the the accidental application of too much force to the brake lever causes the front wheel to lock up. When this happens in a car you just lose steering. On a bike, you also lose balance and then crash, usually hard. And it hurts because it’s ice. In this case, using only a rear brake will allow you to judge how to most effectively modulate your tire’s rotational speed (whether it’s a lever or drivetrain, arguably easier with the latter) without losing control of your bike, and thusly slow it as quickly as possible given the conditions.

    Just like a helmet doesn’t stop you from breaking your neck, a brake will not protect you from bad riding. Proper awareness (inclusive of understanding your braking distance) and defensive riding will head off most panic stops. If a panic stop is a daily occurrence you should examine your riding habits a bit closer.

    Also, it’s a myth that having a front brake on a fixie for panic stops will actually help you. If you’re not in the habit of using it (like you should be), it will not occur to you as an instinct to grab it in the split second you are about to crash. Safe riding habits means always riding safe, not thinking about what would be safe in a given circumstance.

    And I hope it mega-snows this year so I can take out the cross-check with some knobs into the deserted streets for some good ol’ sleigh ridin’. Yee-haw!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dabby November 1, 2010 at 10:58 am

    Ok, For starters, while he was obviously a smart man, Sheldon Brown’s comments are not some sort of bible.

    They are his ideas on things. I wish people would quit pointing to his web site as the end all answer to bike questions.

    Moving on.

    Some of you will never understand the drive train and braking abilities of another type of bicycle.

    This is understandable. you don’t get it.

    But once again, to continue to comment about something you do not understand, after people who do understand have explained it quite fully, is ludicrous.

    I actually have a friend who rides for a living, single speed freewheel, no brakes.
    Big City, Big traffic. Not our pansy ass Portland traffic either.

    Is it smart? No.
    Do I understand why he does it? No.
    Does he fully stop, panic, no panic, when he wants or needs to?

    Yes, easily. So, regardless of what professionals, Sheldon Brown, or the laws of physic’s say, he can easily and safely panic stop.

    And “are”,

    A very effective way to stop on a track bike is to lean way into the front wheel, pretty much laying your balls onto your stem.
    The rear wheel lifts off the street, you lock up the drive train, and slam the rear tire to the street, very effectively speed checking or even panic stopping.

    I call it a Hop Stop.
    This all with no stupid redundant front brake.

    So your comment #69 is way off base….

    Recommended Thumb up 0