Support BikePortland

Blumenauer, DeFazio team with GOP on Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Act

Posted by on November 15th, 2013 at 9:48 am

L to R: Earl Blumenauer (D), Mike McCaul (R), Peter DeFazio (D), Howard Coble (R).
(Images: Blumenauer by J. Maus/BikePortland. All others via Facebook)

On a day when we learned U.S. traffic fatalities in 2012 went up for the first time since 2005 — with notable spikes in bicycling and walking deaths — Oregon Congressmen Earl Blumenauer and Peter DeFazio joined with two of their Republican colleagues, Howard Coble (NC) and Mike McCaul (TX) to introduce the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Act (H.R. 3494).

The bill looks to balance federal traffic safety spending — which currently tilts drastically toward motor vehicle operators at the expense of people who use our roads on bikes or on foot. The bill’s authors claim that while almost 16 percent of traffic deaths in 2012 were people who were walking and bicycling, less than 1 percent of safety funding goes toward infrastructure to protect them. They also say that federal traffic safety improvements that have led to a declining rate of fatalities among motor vehicle operators and occupants, “have not helped all road users.” “Even as driver and passenger deaths have decreased, the percentage of bicyclist and pedestrian roadway deaths has increased in recent years.”

The fix, they say, is to decouple federal safety funding guidelines and give states more flexibility in how the money is spent.

Here’s an excerpt from a statement sent out by Rep. Blumenauer’s office yesterday:

“[The bill] would require the US Department of Transportation to set separate measures for motorized and non-motorized safety. States would be able to set their own safety targets and have the flexibility to choose the best methods to meet them. The legislation encourages states to make their roadways safer without diverting funding from other safety needs.”

As a lever to make these changes, the bill’s sponsors point to the existing transportation law, MAP-21, which requires states to set performance goals for reducing traffic fatalities and injuries. If the goals aren’t met, the USDOT can require state DOTs and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (like Metro for our region) to set aside a larger portion of federal grant funds for safety-specific projects.

Rep. Blumenauer says the time for stronger non-motorized safety standards has come due to a 60 percent increase in the amount of bicycle commuters over the past decade.

While this bill is not likely to move on its own, it is something that could be stuffed into another piece of legislation. It also gives voters and lawmakers something to point to as an example of how biking and walking safety should be a bipartisan issue.

Please support BikePortland.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

  • John Lascurettes November 15, 2013 at 10:26 am

    Link to act text is expired.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dave November 15, 2013 at 3:10 pm

    It’s good to see that it’s a bipartisan bill; maybe my congresshack Jamie Herrera Buetler can get behind it.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Anne Hawley November 15, 2013 at 4:10 pm

    I wonder if there’s some way to fold the figures for relative spending on safety into the unpleasant “bikes don’t pay their share” argument. I’m not sure how it would work, but it strikes me a valid part of the bigger picture.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • davemess November 15, 2013 at 4:13 pm

    Ah congress……old white guys in suits (with pins on them!)……..

    (sorry, but anytime you put a bunch of profile pics of congressmen side by side like that, that’s all I can think about).

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR November 15, 2013 at 4:40 pm

    Chalk the increase up to smart phones and distracted driving.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • dwainedibbly November 15, 2013 at 5:16 pm

    Thanks, Earl!

    Next step: Legalize short-range cell phone jammers. Require them to be broadcasting in motor vehicles whenever the engine is running unless the operator holds two buttons pressed, one at each end of the dashbo… No, that would never work.

    Recommended Thumb up 0