Comments

At BikePortland, we think your comments are just as important as our stories. This page lists all comments made on BikePortland.org, with recent comments at the top.

If you love great comments as much as we do, check out our Comment of the Week column. Please help us find more great ones by simply typing "comment of the week" in a comment.

Return to the Front Page.


  1. Comment by Hello, Kitty June 22, 2018 @ 10:08 am | Link

    I had a big load to carry, but was dropping it off at my destination.

    In response to Car2go and ReachNow announce bike racks on Portland fleet vehicles Array


  2. Comment by Hello, Kitty June 22, 2018 @ 10:05 am | Link

    Bring on the donkeys!

    In response to Car2go and ReachNow announce bike racks on Portland fleet vehicles Array


  3. Comment by jered June 22, 2018 @ 9:44 am | Link

    Nextdoor is THE place people go to complain on the internet - GET OFF MY LAWN! It is like bikeportland for everything else people like to complain about (rim shot).

    In response to What's going on with the North Rosa Parks Way project? Array


  4. Comment by Middle of the Road Guy June 22, 2018 @ 9:34 am | Link

    They are horrible and about twice as long as the old cycle. additionally, the crosswalk button on the NW corner does not seem to work.

    In response to What's going on with the North Rosa Parks Way project? Array


  5. Comment by Blake June 22, 2018 @ 9:34 am | Link

    That is a totally fair point, and I thought PBOT itself was recognizing that they are not an ideal solution. I guess what I suspect is that the white wand thing is a total red herring and the real objection is is "they really don’t like is space being used for bikes instead of cars". If they want to put a green curb between the bike lane and parking, I would be totally fine with that or anything else that creates a deterrent for parking in the bike lane. Paint obviously doesn't work for that (see: N Lombard at N Exeter every Sunday when the Flea Market is operating)

    In response to What's going on with the North Rosa Parks Way project? Array


  6. Comment by Kyle Banerjee June 22, 2018 @ 9:31 am | Link

    Because there is a net gain and it nudges things in the right direction. Fewer total cars require fewer resources to produce and use them. Plus, people are going to prefer car share vehicles that fit the need at hand rather than buying a vehicle that accommodates the greatest need they perceive.

    The average car is used only 5% of the time meaning it's parked 95% of the time consuming space that could be used for anything else -- even things that help active transportation.

    If you want to treat it the same as everyone buying their own SUVs, don't be surprised when nothing changes.

    In response to Car2go and ReachNow announce bike racks on Portland fleet vehicles Array


  7. Comment by q June 22, 2018 @ 9:20 am | Link

    I disagree. I don't fault anyone for not liking the look of countless wands. There are solutions that are a lot safer and more permanent than plastic pipes, and also that would look better, and even improve the street's appearance. I hope that someday people will be ashamed that anyone ever thought plastic pipes were an appropriate way to protect people.

    And if people are using the white wands' appearance as a false arguing point, when what they really don't like is space being used for bikes instead of cars, then doing something better than wands shuts them up, or at least forces them to admit what they really don't like.

    In response to What's going on with the North Rosa Parks Way project? Array


  8. Comment by Blake June 22, 2018 @ 8:50 am | Link

    "nearby residents told PBOT they were worried rows of white, plastic wands would make Rosa Parks feel less like a neighborhood and more like a highway"

    That's not the fault of the white wands, it's the fault of a road that is wide enough to be a highway that people drive on like it IS a highway. Why do we even bother to listen to people's input when it is so ridiculous? When new safety projects are introduced, it should be a default that it is done unless it can be demonstrated that it doesn't address the intended problem. No more of this whining NIMBY "it will change the feel of my neighborhood" nonsense.

    In response to What's going on with the North Rosa Parks Way project? Array


  9. Comment by paikiala June 22, 2018 @ 8:39 am | Link

    S,
    The cameras run $35k+ per enforcement direction just to install, and cost v. effectiveness is always a public-sector factor in decision making. The speed cameras are best suited for high volume locations, probably roads above 15,000 vehicles per day. Marine Drive serves about 13,000 where new cameras were recently activated.
    I would not wish for a Singapore style police state, and expanding the reach of police powers is a step in that direction. What was it B. Franklin said about giving up freedom for security and achieving neither?

    In response to Portland Police Bureau names (another) new Traffic Division captain Array


  10. Comment by Dan A June 22, 2018 @ 8:32 am | Link

    March 26, 2018, "Tempe police chief says early probe shows no fault by Uber"

    https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Exclusive-Tempe-police-chief-says-early-probe-12765481.php

    “The driver said it was like a flash, the person walked out in front of them,” said Sylvia Moir, police chief in Tempe, Ariz.

    From viewing the videos, “it’s very clear it would have been difficult to avoid this collision in any kind of mode (autonomous or human-driven) based on how she came from the shadows right into the roadway,” Moir said.

    “I suspect preliminarily it appears that the Uber would likely not be at fault in this accident, either,” Moir said.

    Today

    Police released a 318-page report indicating that Herzberg would have been seen 143 down the road by 85 percent of motorists, and that the crash was "entirely avoidable" had the backup driver been looking down the road instead of watching The Voice on her phone.

    It's interesting how different a traffic investigation plays out when the world is watching. 318 pages!

    In response to The Monday Roundup: A deadly Uber, better bus stops, a new Surly, and more Array


  11. Comment by 9watts June 22, 2018 @ 8:12 am | Link

    Hear, hear.

    In response to Car2go and ReachNow announce bike racks on Portland fleet vehicles Array


  12. Comment by MTW June 22, 2018 @ 7:53 am | Link

    Similarly, I don't think the sensors at Tillamook and MLK (heading eastbound) have been working since that intersection was repaved. That's been several months now. The blue light doesn't illuminate anymore and other cyclists seem to have noticed too because somebody will usually head over and hit the pedestrian button.

    In response to What's going on with the North Rosa Parks Way project? Array


  13. Comment by twowheeler June 22, 2018 @ 7:49 am | Link

    This is such a disingenuous comparison.

    In response to Guest Post: It's time to make southeast Portland's infrastructure gaps "SEAMless" Array


  14. Comment by twowheeler June 22, 2018 @ 7:43 am | Link

    Not exactly fun to pull a bike trailer, especially if it's been raining.

    In response to Guest Post: It's time to make southeast Portland's infrastructure gaps "SEAMless" Array


  15. Comment by Rivelo June 22, 2018 @ 7:01 am | Link

    I don't know if it qualifies as "push-back," but there was a lot of grumbling on Nextdoor regarding the changes. Of course, there is always a lot of grumbling on Nextdoor, so who knows?

    https://nextdoor.com/news_feed/?post=83487013&comment=180809736

    In response to What's going on with the North Rosa Parks Way project? Array


  16. Comment by twowheeler June 22, 2018 @ 6:32 am | Link

    Terry isn't wrong. I didn't read anywhere where he said ALL gravel roads can't be walked or biked on. But some of the "roads" in this area of Portland are difficult to pass on a bike, with a stroller, etc., especially when they're wet and have giant puddles (some of them mini lakes). These roads should also be reasonable passable in the dark; some of them aren't unless you have a crazy amount of light. It's 2018 and Portland is a major city. It shouldn't have roads looking worse than many 3rd world countries.

    I get the argument that some people like them because they reduce traffic on their street, but they also make the grid incredibly incomplete in much of this area. Try taking a side roads route parallel to Woodstock between 52nd and 39th. There is no fully paved route this way.
    I'm fine with many of these roads remaining gravel, but the city needs to own up and maintain them. Get a grader out there a few times a year and do their jobs for the citizens in these under served neighborhoods who pay more than their appropriate proportion of property taxes.

    In response to Guest Post: It's time to make southeast Portland's infrastructure gaps "SEAMless" Array


  17. Comment by Portland's Electric Bicycle Store June 22, 2018 @ 5:10 am | Link

    This project is an accident waiting to happen.

    When people park illegally against the curb (in the bike lane), others come and park legally - which blocks the illegally parked folks from being able to leave. This leads the illegally parked folks to become angry and volatile.

    Parking in the bike lanes. Folks are confused. The confusion causes drivers to act unpredictably. It is a matter of time - in my opinion a short amount of time - until someone is injured or killed due to the confusion.

    What can be done now?

    1. Paint the curbs red! It will clearly indicate to drivers that parking is not allowed and it will enable the city to being ticketing folks who park in the bike lanes.

    2. Put temporary hay bales in the buffer zone between the parking or driving areas and the bike lanes so folks know that the bike lanes are for bikes.

    The difficulty of how the Rosa Parks bike lane project is being rolled out is that it further demonstrates that cyclists do not have physical or legal space on Portland's roads.

    In response to What's going on with the North Rosa Parks Way project? Array


  18. Comment by q June 21, 2018 @ 10:17 pm | Link

    PBOT seems erratic in its follow-through. In my own neighborhood, PBOT sent out flyers a week ago announcing the start of a total street repaving for a full block. A day later, it had made several hundred feet of sawcuts in preparation of pavement removal for the full block. A couple days later, after repaving only a few feet--maybe 20% of the project, the crew said they were done and left. The project manager confirmed to me the project has been abandoned, with no explanation. So PBOT torpedoed a project in mid-stream without notice to anyone.

    As with the Rosa Parks project, the scheduling and decision making seems bizarre.

    In response to What's going on with the North Rosa Parks Way project? Array


  19. Comment by David Smart June 21, 2018 @ 10:07 pm | Link

    The idea that consent is required for photos is idiotic. Someone can be naked and that's their right, and it's their right to ride on a secret route that I can't avoid because they won't tell me what roads to avoid, but it's somehow my fault if they fall into the line of my camera?

    I'm all for freedom of speech, but not freedom from repercussions. Actions have consequences. Things that happen in in public social spaces may end up on public social media.

    In response to Portland's Naked Bike Ride is Saturday. Here's what you need to know Array


  20. Comment by soren impey June 21, 2018 @ 10:06 pm | Link

    "For those of us who got rid of our cars and rely on Car2Go"

    I was trying very, very hard not to post on this thread but this comment drew me in.

    Proponents of active transportation tend to agree that we should discourage car use by people who use their cars fairly often (e.g. most people). Why then should we encourage (and subsidize) car use by people who use cars somewhat less often (e.g. many "car free" people)? It's not as if the tragic negative externalities of driving a 5.5 ton gas-guzzling SUV are substantially negated simply because the driver of the vehicle has "car free" status.

    In response to Car2go and ReachNow announce bike racks on Portland fleet vehicles Array


  21. Comment by soren impey June 21, 2018 @ 9:55 pm | Link

    such an optimist...

    In response to Car2go and ReachNow announce bike racks on Portland fleet vehicles Array


  22. Comment by core:aggregator:bad-response June 21, 2018 @ 9:22 pm | Link

    There may be an issue with the Event Aggregator server. Please try your import again later.

    In response to Record: schedule facebook daily 239494 Array


  23. Comment by Richard Roy June 21, 2018 @ 9:07 pm | Link

    No constructed single track, just gravel, natural surfaces, old jeep trails, cow trails, some slick rock even.

    In response to With 'Skull' event, Burns stakes a claim as America's best gravel riding destination Array


  24. Comment by Richard Roy June 21, 2018 @ 9:04 pm | Link

    A few days after last year's event we had numerous lightning-caused fires, and this year? Yep, several fires started yesterday after a big storm blew through with LOTS of lightning. We lose resources AND communications (dispatch center) once we start the fire season regardless of the size of the fires.

    In response to With 'Skull' event, Burns stakes a claim as America's best gravel riding destination Array


  25. Comment by Jim Lee June 21, 2018 @ 8:35 pm | Link

    David Hampsten
    Ah, but can it navigate the hazards of neighborhood politics? Can it overcome 150 years of city policies? Can it, in other words, deliver the goods?Recommended 0

    Perhaps it can. Several years ago I was standing by my track/cross hybrid at City Hall when Catharine Ciarlo accused me of being a "trouble-maker," a crime to which I am obliged to plead, "guilty!"

    In response to Guest Post: It's time to make southeast Portland's infrastructure gaps "SEAMless" Array


Comments