Showers Pass Warehouse Sale

What a road diet on SW Barbur would look like

Posted by on April 23rd, 2013 at 3:40 pm

A rendering by Owen Walz of what SW Barbur Blvd could look like where it passes over SW Vermont.
– Click to enlarge –


As you might recall, a few months ago the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) was feeling heat from the public to consider a road diet on SW Barbur Blvd. Specifically, people were urging the agency to consider reconfiguring lanes to improve bike access over two bridges as part of a $5 million rehab project. The bike lanes on SW Barbur where it crosses SW Vermont and Newbury streets drops suddenly and and leaves people on bikes in a vulnerable position.

Here’s what it looks like now…

Now, local illustrator and graphic designer Owen Walz has released a rendering of what a road diet on SW Barbur could look like. Walz is volunteer with Friends of Barbur (Facebook), a group of citizen activists that have been pushing for a more bike-friendly Barbur for several years. (A road diet is called out as a recommendation in the Barbur Concept Plan, which is set to be adopted by Portland City Council tomorrow.)

Walz created the rendering above as part of a series of visualizations for the Bicycle Transportation Alliance’s (BTA) forthcoming Blueprint for Better Bicycling.

As for the status of the Barbur road diet idea, last time we checked (in March) ODOT had handed off the conversation to Metro’s SW Corridor planning process. Here’s more ODOT Community Affairs Coordinator Jilayne Jordan:

“A road diet is included in three of the five Southwest Corridor Plan project packages now being analyzed and modeled by Metro. Results of this analysis are expected in April. This analysis will provide all project stakeholders with a comprehensive look at the benefits and impacts of this project for cyclists, pedestrians, future high capacity transit operations and auto/freight users. Meanwhile, the Barbur Boulevard (OR 99W) Newbury Street and Vermont Street Bridge Rehabilitation project will proceed as planned, in a manner that does not preclude nor prejudice potential future redesigns of Barbur Boulevard.”

To learn more about the SW Corridor Plan and (possibly) about the prospects of a road diet on SW Barbur Blvd, there’s an open house this Thursday (4/25) at 5:30 p.m. Multnomah Arts Center (7688 SW Capitol Highway). You can also peruse the official SW Corridor Plan website.

If you’re so inclined to express your perspectives on this project, Metro’s project manager for the SW Corridor Plan is Malu Wilkinson who can be reached at (503) 797-1680 or malu.wilkinson@oregonmetro.gov; and ODOT’s project manager is Talia Jacobson who can be reached at (503) 731-3049 or talia.jacobson@odot.state.or.us.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

39
Leave a Reply

avatar
28 Comment threads
11 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
31 Comment authors
vernseeshellbiketnashGarlynn WoodsongGlowBoy Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
K'Tesh
Guest
K'Tesh

LOVE IT!!! I HATE having to play dodgecar on SW Barbur. I’m sure that the motorists hate when I take the lane at the first bridge, and don’t move back until I get to that fly-around on the far side of the second.

Please Powers-that-Be… Do this!

q`Tzal
Guest
q`Tzal

As a temporary safety compromise:
Install a HAWK style warning flasher highlighting a “BIKE LANE ENDS / SHARE THE ROAD” whenever a bicycle triggers a loop or camera detector.
It would go like this:
Sign is always there,
When a bicycle approaches the highway to the danger zone they are detected,
The HAWK enhanced safety warning lights activate,
Lights stay on for 30 seconds after sensor is triggered.

Then get on to the REAL fix – a road diet.

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

Paint is pretty cheap, especially when they are already working on the road.

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

Awesome. As someone that grew up very close to this stretch, I strongly support this. There is absolutely no need for two northbound vehicle lanes in this section.

shirtsoff
Guest
shirtsoff

I appreciate that the pedestrian zone is placed furthest out towards the open view of the valley below. It shows an understanding of how the different modes are likely to utilize the space and prioritizes those most likely to enjoy the scenery without disrupting other modes’ flow.

Steve B
Guest
Steve B

Great work as always, Owen!

Joseph E
Guest

Did Owen bill ODOT $10,000 for that rendering? 😉
Looks amazing!

Owen Walz
Guest

Thanks Joseph! I wish. If you know someone who actually has a budget for this kind of thing please let me know.

Peter W
Guest
Peter W

Curious what tools were used to make the visualization? Advocates need to up their game and this is a perfect example from some who have done that.

Owen Walz
Guest

Thanks Peter. I put this together with Sketchup, a rendering plugin, and Photoshop. I’d share the process with anyone who’s interested, although it’s not fully refined yet.

Chris Anderson
Guest

I’d attend a workshop on how to do street visualizations. I’m familiar with various photo editing tools but looking over someone’s shoulder at techniques would be helpful.

Racer X
Guest
Racer X

Yes nice work Owen. Add me to your list for an informal 101 session on Sketchup. (Might make a great wonk night item or Pedal Palooza activity.)

GlowBoy
Guest
GlowBoy

Looks fantastic. This is exactly what I envision. I would ride Barbur home from work a lot more often if it looked like that!

Nick
Guest
Nick

That diet looks delicious.

BURR
Guest
BURR

good work!

Chainwhipped
Guest

If barbur looked like this, I might still live in SW Portland.

Indy
Guest
Indy

I take Beaverton-Hillsdale to Barbur, which adds about ~4 minutes to my commute, versus Barbur, exactly because there isn’t a setup like this.

This would be fantastic. Barbur really doesn’t get much traffic Southbound on these bridges until the evening rush. Northbound I’ve never seen a need for two lanes.

lyle w.
Guest
lyle w.

Agreed. And my anecdotal experience from riding Barbur over the last year and half is that every time I had someone brush by me in the too close ( a few times WAY too close) it was going southbound… and usually at the second bridge.

Terry D
Guest
Terry D

I wrote a letter in support of this project, told my story and set it to ODOT. This was my commute from NW for 5 years, this section is a nightmare and is the only time in my whole life or riding that I was almost killed. Fix this NOW.

John Landolfe
Guest

Nice work, Owen.

Andrew K
Guest
Andrew K

Looks pretty darn good to me.

I just sent a letter to ODOT this morning urging them to consider this option.

Drew
Guest
Drew

Love the concept, but in your final version take care to flip the hash markings 180 degrees.

Todd Boulanger
Guest
Todd Boulanger

Yes ditto – good job. Add me to any how to session too.

was carless
Guest
was carless

I’ve been biking on public highways my entire life in Oregon, but I have never biked on Barbur because I believe it is too dangerous. This looks like it would be a good fix.

AndyC of Linnton
Guest
AndyC of Linnton

Yes! I’m excited for this to happen. More access to Southwest is sorely needed. Thanks for the rendering, Owen.

AndyC of Linnton
Guest
AndyC of Linnton

Could you also imagine some bollards in this rendering?

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

I think this rendering shows the project after 2 weeks, when all the plastic bollards have been knocked down by careless drivers.

q`Tzal
Guest
q`Tzal

You belittle the problem.
It isn’t a matter of paint but a matter of ODOT being willing to take the heat from the non-cycling public (sadly a BIG angry majority) if they take a lane away from the motoring public to say nothing of the “Hole-in-the-Air” provision that freight interests will cite to show that the lane cannot be removed/restricted from automotive access.

It is one thing to say “it’s easy, JUST DO IT!”
It is an entirely different matter to have to share public resources with a public majority that doesn’t acknowledge the need exists.
For ~$500 I can get enough rubber speed bumps and engineering grade epoxy to permanently reduce the speed limit on this stretch of Barbur to 25mph; this would be be illegal and selfish.

Work in the system or invite anarchy.

Phil Richman
Guest
Phil Richman

q’Tzal, You cite a public majority of those who don’t acknowledge the need exists yet I am personally chair of a SW Neighborhood, sat on the Barbur Concept Plan working group, have been involved in SW Corridor Plan meetings, and have spoken with many a SW Neighbor the majority of whom are not regular cyclists. In this process I have personally engaged hundreds of people most of whom only drive the corridor. In my estimate of these interviews I’d estimate only about 1% oppose the idea. So where is the opposition? Is it coming from people who live nowhere near these bridges and only use Barbur as a faster alternative to I-5?

This is precisely the reason why PBOT needs to work more closely with ODOT and make this a priority. Otherwise we all just await the inevitable severe injury or death that will occur in the present state.

vern
Guest
vern

If you don’t think that there are lots of drivers that will be upset at the loss of a lane (to say nothing of freight haulers) you need to talk to more people. No question changes are needed but taking away a lane can’t be the only solution. How about narrow suspension bridges on each side. They could come in real handy when both the existing structures fail during the cascading quake.

q`Tzal
Guest
q`Tzal

Accidental duplicate below:

You belittle the problem.
It isn’t a matter of paint but a matter of ODOT being willing to take the heat from the non-cycling public (sadly a BIG angry majority) if they take a lane away from the motoring public to say nothing of the “Hole-in-the-Air” provision that freight interests will cite to show that the lane cannot be removed/restricted from automotive access.

It is one thing to say “it’s easy, JUST DO IT!”
It is an entirely different matter to have to share public resources with a public majority that doesn’t acknowledge the need exists.
For ~$500 I can get enough rubber speed bumps and engineering grade epoxy to permanently reduce the speed limit on this stretch of Barbur to 25mph; this would be be illegal and selfish.

Work in the system or invite anarchy.

Wayneh
Guest
Wayneh

I soooo wish this would happen. This is part of my commute to and from NW starting back in Tigard. Early enough in the morning and there’s not much traffic northbound. But coming home at rush hour can be a bit hairy as drivers accelerate away from their stressful day downtown. This just makes too much sense to me.

dwainedibbly
Guest
dwainedibbly

I really like this rendering. Good work!

Curtis
Guest
Curtis

I’ve been riding Barbur since 1987, SW to close-in N. Although this would make it nicer for bikes, at present I usually just ramp up onto those narrow sidewalks SB. I’m in Hillsdale so NB I’m taking the Capitol Hwy overpass. I want to see a better connection from Barbur to Front.

lyle w.
Guest
lyle w.

I hate to be the one to say this, but we all know what type of event would change that projected timeline for a bike lane refurbishment from ‘decades’ to a lot sooner than that.

So who wants to be the sacrificial lamb?

GlowBoy
Guest
GlowBoy

A few years ago I talked to a Portland cop who used to bike to work — but stopped because his route involved Barbur and he decided it was too dangerous.

Attention ODOT: when police officers are afraid to use your bike lanes, and when Indy is willing to add several minutes to his commute and take Beaverton-Hillsdale/Capitol (also dangerous!) instead, it shows that SW is in need of serious help. Please (consider and) approve this project.

And if it’s going to take a long time, please don’t this needed road diet delay the improvements already planned for the bridge sidewalks/ramps: even those changes will be a huge safety improvement for those of us who occasionally ride this road today.

Garlynn Woodsong
Guest
Garlynn Woodsong

Great rendering — though it would be even better if the little white-stripey-buffer area between the auto and bicycle lanes were replaced with a planter strip, or at least some raised concrete, to add an added level oh physical and psychological protection, especially for any potential pedestrians on the other side of the bicycle lane… but hey, this would be a great start, and better than what’s out there today for sure!

tnash
Guest
tnash

Cool! I will continue to Not bike on Barbur b/c it trips my Danger flag, but, it’s better than it was! 🙂

seeshellbike
Guest
seeshellbike

I’m holding out for something even better – there have been several ideas in conjunction with the Southwest Corridor Plan