Cyclist gets $100,000 and an apology for sewer grate spill

Noticed this story on KGW yesterday:

“A Portland cyclist launched to the asphalt will get a $100,000 settlement check from the City of Portland.

The city forgot to change a sewer grate when it created a bike lane in Southwest Portland.

Essentially, it accidentally set a trap and cyclist Gary Dunkley fell right into it.”

The story says Dunkley was “going about 25 mph” when he hit the grate and then stopped instantly, resulting in 60 stitches, memory loss, and double vision.

Commissioner Sam apologized, said the settlement is “absolutely appropriate” and asked everyone to call in hazards to PDOT’s traffic safety hotline, (503) 823-SAFE (7233).

Read and watch the full story on KGW.com (registration might be req’d).

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car owner and driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, feel free to contact me at @jonathan_maus on Twitter, via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a supporter.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

24 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve
Steve
16 years ago

Although it is pretty obvious the city made a mistake, it seems a $100,000.00 \”fine\” is a tad extreme. Does Mr. Dunkley suffer from any long-term effects and was this settlement in lieu of medical costs or in addition?

Andre
Andre
16 years ago

I thought that local/muni/state/feds all were immune from litigation brought by them about accidents that happen on the roadways.

a.O
a.O
16 years ago

I\’d say 100k was the low end of what I would want if I had 60 stitches and a traumatic brain injury because of the City\’s (or anybody\’s) negligence. It\’s also probably on the low end of what he could have gotten at trial, so it probably reflects a willingness to have his medical bills paid, have compensation for lost income, and be done with it. I\’d say we, the taxpayers, came out OK here. And I hope they fired the idiots who can\’t successfully perform the simple task of changing a sewer grate.

Because it\’s a \”settlement,\” it likely covers all aspects of his injuries in exchange for release of his claim against the City.

nick
nick
16 years ago

i disagree. 60 stitches IN HIS HEAD is going to have what you might call long-term effects from a aesthetic perspective, if nothing else.

so 100 grand sounds reasonable to me. don\’t forget, his lawyer will get a chunk.

i know folks who have been doored and ended up with permanent loss of range of motion, pins in wrists, and far less money.

Paul Souders
16 years ago

So where *was* this grate?

Jerrod
Jerrod
16 years ago

I got hit by a guy who ran a red light. Permanent neck damage, concussion, facial scaring, back pain, etc. I got 30K, but I ended up getting only about 16K. I would say 100K is pretty good!

felix
16 years ago

learn to bunny hop!

Spencer
Spencer
16 years ago

Was there a helmet involved?

Mr. Viddy
16 years ago

A nice payday for a retard who probably should have known better than to go speeding over any metal grate or potentially slick surface.

Todd Boulanger
Todd Boulanger
16 years ago

Previous press coverage of this incidence mentioned that the bicyclist was wearing both a helmet and gloves.

And who knows what the traffic conditions were at the time (I have not seen the collision report/ case file or press coverage of it)…perhaps he could not pull out into the lane of traffic to avoid it, or the other grates were bike friendly vs. one old school grate, etc.

The retrofitting of existing streets with bike lanes often leads to unforeseen (at the time of the original construction) design issues or cost compromises in the retrofit:
– change in bike tire widths over time (balloon tires to high pressure narrow tires) and widths of motor vehicles (remember when many cars were as narrow as a Beetle?)
– location and density of traffic (street widening that does not relocate older utility or traffic grates and covers outside the bike lane)
– location of travel path in relation to where the pavement overlays end, and longitudinal expansion joints/ utility cuts
– drainage grates and gutter pans vs. installing sewer inlets under the sidewalk

One who knows
One who knows
16 years ago

Mr. Viddy:

You are an ****. The grate was located on the blind curve, and within the striped and marked bicycle lane. If a guy can\’t ride safely over grates located in the bike lane, then where the hell can he ride.

You are obviously one of those **** who thinks all bicyclists should ride on the sidewalk.

BURR
BURR
16 years ago

Way to be a ****, Mr Viddy! There are bike lanes all over this city with sunken double-wide drainage grates that occupy 2/3 to 3/4 of the bike lane, the city is lucky they aren\’t paying out money like this on a routine basis for their substandard bike lane designs.

Moo
Moo
16 years ago

If he wasn\’t a **** for hitting the grate before…he may be one now. 100k sounds piddly.

Greg
Greg
16 years ago

I agree that 100k isn\’t much for a traumatic brain injury – and for everyone else – think about running fatter tires on your city bikes.

Bicycle Quarterly did an article a ways back on tire efficiency in the real world – result is that suppleness, not high pressure is what matters most. (Or at least you can have fat and supple tires that are not slow.)

Fat tires also give a nice ride. My grocery bike runs 50mm tires (which admittedly are a bit slow) and my commute bike runs 38mm tires (which are pretty speedy). I used to run 23/25mm tires in the city and I feel a lot more confident when I hit a road hazard now 🙂

rixtir
rixtir
16 years ago

Bicycle Quarterly did an article a ways back on tire efficiency in the real world – result is that suppleness, not high pressure is what matters most. (Or at least you can have fat and supple tires that are not slow.)

Fat tires also give a nice ride. My grocery bike runs 50mm tires (which admittedly are a bit slow) and my commute bike runs 38mm tires (which are pretty speedy). I used to run 23/25mm tires in the city and I feel a lot more confident when I hit a road hazard now 🙂

I used to run 25mm for years, and while they were quite fast, they were also quite inadequate for handling surface defects. I\’m running 38mm now, on a bike I bought specifically for city riding, and they\’re a lot more forgiving when I hit one of the inevitable cracks or potholes that exist in the real world.

Mark
Mark
16 years ago

None of us can tell Mr. Dunkley how to spend his money, but wouldn\’t it be noble if he donated a portion (after medical bills, etc.) to a reputable organization (e.g. BTA) to fund some worthy bike program/cause.

Moo
Moo
16 years ago

Yeah Mark, maybe he should take all the bloggers out to lunch and buy us all new rain and safety gear too.

felix
16 years ago

It would be better if he spent his money to someone who debunks frivolous law suites! Sucks you got hurt but sometimes shit happens.

Boo Hoo
Boo Hoo
16 years ago

As JT says…Cry me a River.
Get a car instead.

rixtir
rixtir
16 years ago

It would be better if he spent his money to someone who debunks frivolous law suites!

And some of those suites are quite frivolous….or at least ostentatious.

Jeff Ong
Jeff Ong
16 years ago

Does the city have anyone actually ride these bike routes before \”opening\” them? It seems like some extensive beta-testing, if you will, might have helped spot the omission before the accident happened.

gary
16 years ago

In reply to the posted comments.
I was wearing a helmet and gloves. My tire size was 35 mm – adequate for city riding safely.
The sewer grate had been left unchanged after they a had redone the roadway there, when it
definitely should have been replaced.
Another rider had made the city aware of the grate issue two ( or three ) months prior to my accident.
Actually, a motorist had entered ( in a hurry to get to the intersection ) the bike lane when I came around the blind corner. The result was I had no choice but to go over the grate to miss hitting the car.
The settlement, will in my belief not cover the long term medical costs or lose of mobility ( will need a shoulder replacement in the future), have had cognitive changes, double vision and other issues. I lucked out that I was not a pretty face before the accident
Yes, the settlement releases the city from all future claims and leaves me to deal with the future
medical expenses and issues I will incur. As one person said I was tired and wanted to settle and move on.

Mike
15 years ago

This settlement amount seems pretty low to me. Based on what I saw on TV and Mr. Dunkley’s comments above, it will not even cover his future healthcare costs. I settled a similar case this year for approximately five times that and the insurance company was eager to settle, as a jury would have likely awarded my client much more.

I don’t think there are too many cyclists in Portland who would trade their health for $100,000, minus medical expenses. I know I would not.

Brian
Brian
5 years ago

Sadly, Gary Dunkley died in September 2018 under still mysterious circumstances. He was found down an embankment in SW Portland several weeks after going missing. Gary never really recovered from the brain injury suffered in this 2007 wreck. A tribute to him can be found at ORbike.

http://orbike.com/remembering-gary-dunkley/