Portland Bike Forums (by BikePortland.org)

Go Back   Portland Bike Forums (by BikePortland.org) > General Discussion > All About the West Side
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-11-2013, 12:23 PM
wsbob's Avatar
wsbob wsbob is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,755
Default WashCo BTC news

The March BTC newsletter included some good info about bike related bills on the Oregon Legislature's agenda. Kind of frustrating though, that I could not find a link to the BTC's newsletter. Link to the homepage: http://www.washingtoncountybikes.org/this_is_us/

There was helpful info in addition to what I've posted below, but here's a cut/paste section of that newsletter:


"...There are some interesting transportation bills in the legislature this season.

HB 2732
creates the definition of multiuse path,
bans headphones and earbuds for both ears (allows one ear to be covered).
Extends the safe passing distance (wide enough berth to avoid a cyclist who falls over) to all roads, not just those without bike lanes and to all speeds, not just over 35mph.
Allows cyclist to leave a bike lane whenever going straight at any intersection where motorists may turn right.

SB 742 raises the helmet age. It requires helmets for everyone under 18 instead of the current under 16.

SB 741 requires helmets for all age cyclists while participating in an organized exhibition, competition or contest.

SB 769 requires bike registration, and like car registration requires reporting address changes and sale of bike. However, unlike car registration, none of the fee pays for the registration program. The entire $10 would be deposited in the Bicycle Transportation Improvement Fund, also established by this bill.

HB 2687 Requires that motorists use daytime running lights. Why should bicyclists care? This would make cars more noticeable—more noticeable than bicycles, which don't have lights bright enough to show up in sunlight. ..."

Notice SB 742, requiring mandatory helmet use age from 16 to 18. I didn't look into the bill, but I wonder whose idea it was to introduce this bill, who the sponsors are, and why they thought 17 and 18 year old people needed to be required by law to wear bike helmets while riding. This increase in age coverage seems unnecessary to me. In fact, if anything age related to mandatory helmet use, it might be worth considering, lowering the age for mandatory helmet use to 14 yrs and under.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2013, 11:07 PM
wsbob's Avatar
wsbob wsbob is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,755
Default

Again, the WCBTC has some good info in its monthly newsletter. If you want to subscribe, here's the editor's contact info: "WashCo BTC" <editor@washcobtc.org>.

Among items listed:

An open house on this coming Wednesday the 10th, about the Farmington Rd improvement project "...6pm to 8pm (stop by any timeóno formal presentation is planned)
Beaverton High School (in the cafeteria)..."

Another open house on this coming Thursday the 11th for the U.S. 26 Brookwood Parkway/Helvetia Interchange project:

"... The freeway interchange is being modernized. See their Project page and Open house mailer for information.

Visit the open house for information for an opportunity to talk to staff.

Thursday, April 11
5:30pm to 7:30pm (drop in anytime)
Liberty High School, Room 165
21945 NW Wagon Wy
Hillsboro ..."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 AM.




A production of Pedaltown Media Inc. / BikePortland.org
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.