Portland Bike Forums (by BikePortland.org)

Go Back   Portland Bike Forums (by BikePortland.org) > General Discussion > General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2008, 11:27 AM
Duncan Duncan is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Tabor
Posts: 188
Question Sidewalk cycling incident.

So this story is second hand, but I think it bears retelling because it leads me to s question that is on my mind:

Yesterday my exwife wal leaving our sons school downtown onto a one way street. The parking lot exit restricts visability of the sidewalk until you pull out a little. She said that she looked down the street and then up the sidewalk as she pulled out when bike-rider (she described him as a commuter on spendy bike wearing yellow and a helmet) came down the sidewalk (against traffic) and came close to colliding with her car (which she stopped fearing said collision.).. The biker started hitting her car and calling her names (including the "C" word, with three kids in the car... langauge dude.). My son (12) calmly rolled down the windows and said "sidewalks are for kids dude, I know how to ride on the street."

So my question: in an urban area (the school is near 21st NW) what is the rule for sidewalk riding? I will often cruise up on a sidewalk within the block of my destination, but definetly slow down, look out for cross traffic.

Now my ex wife isnt perfect, but she is a pretty aware and considerate driver (I have known her for 15 years now, and she has never had an accident or a ticket), and she keeps an eye out for bikes (she knows I am out there and likes to collect child support regularly *) , and if that surprised her, I would say that speeding down the sidewalk agains the flow of traffic sounds like a risky idea...

*so please dont tell her my life insurance is more than she would get in CS!

Last edited by K'Tesh; 03-13-2008 at 11:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2008, 11:33 AM
K'Tesh's Avatar
K'Tesh K'Tesh is offline
Super Moderator
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Subject To Change
Posts: 2,742
Lightbulb Bicycles on Sidewalks... pt 1

I think this should answer your question...

BICYCLES ON SIDEWALKS

Quote:
by Ray Thomas
Ray Thomas is a Portland bike lawyer.

We have been asked by readers over the years to assemble a reference guide for laws in various cities around Oregon that regulate bicycle riding on sidewalks. The law is clear that bicycle riders may ride their bikes on any public road and sidewalk where not prohibited. A number of cities in Oregon prohibit bicycle riding in on the sidewalk in urban core areas. Sometimes these areas are not well marked; and enforcement of the law is sometimes spotty. But it is important to know where you stand (or sit) with the law, and we have contacted a number of communities to find out their positions on bicycles on sidewalks. Clip this article for your riding file and it may save you a ticket if you think to look at it before you venture onto the sidewalk in an unfamiliar area.

If you are cited for riding on the sidewalk, consider appearing in court or writing a letter to the court explaining, if you have a good reason, why you were on the sidewalk in the first place. If you are cited in a city where the ordinance is not posted, impress on the court that, unlike Corvallis, where bicyclists are warned of the prohibition with signs, the city is not even warning bicyclists that riding on the sidewalk might result in what is to you, an extraordinarily large fine. Even if you were riding illegally on the sidewalk when cited, if you appear in traffic court and explain why is that you felt you had no safe alternative but to ride on the sidewalk, the judge may reduce your fine.

For now, if you ride your bicycle on the sidewalk – and that is your right anywhere in the state where doing so is not prohibited by ordinance – you need to know and obey the laws, and, if cited, be ready to pay the fine or argue in traffic court why you were riding on the sidewalk, and why your choice was reasonable or legal.
__________________
Riding my bike is MY pursuit of Happiness!!!
beam.to/UFOBike

Last edited by K'Tesh; 03-13-2008 at 11:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-13-2008, 11:34 AM
K'Tesh's Avatar
K'Tesh K'Tesh is offline
Super Moderator
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Subject To Change
Posts: 2,742
Lightbulb Bicycles on Sidewalks... pt 2

Continued from above:

Quote:
The following is the City Ordinance language for most major cities in Oregon:

Ashland
§ 11.52.030: No person shall ride or operate a bicycle on a sidewalk in the central business district or commercial zone.

Maximum Fine Not to Exceed $500.00

Upon conviction, the court may, in addition to any other penalty, order that the bicycle that was used at the time of the offense be impounded until such time as may appear just and reasonable.



Beaverton
§ 6.02.410: Prohibits riding upon a sidewalk where official signs prohibit bicycle riding.

Fine Not to Exceed $50.00



Bend
§ 6.325: Prohibits riding a bicycle on a sidewalk in any business district, except along an unimproved street or underpass. However, in a business district, bicycles may be ridden on sidewalks to deliver newspapers and messages and to make other deliveries.

§ 6.910 Prohibited Riding Area:
Beginning at the southwest end of the 1200 block of Wall Street, continuing south on Wall Street, to the north side of Newport Avenue. Proceeding west on Newport Avenue to Mirror Pond (Deschutes River). Then proceeding south along the Deschutes River from Newport Avenue to the south side of Franklin Avenue. Continuing east on Franklin Avenue to the west side of Broadway Street. Proceed south on Broadway Street to the south side of Louisiana Avenue. East on Louisiana Avenue from Broadway Street to the west side of Wall Street. South on Wall Street from Louisiana Avenue to the south side of Kansas Street. Continue easterly from Kansas and Wall Street through the Administrative School District property to the southeast corner of the intersection of Kansas and Lava Street. Continue northeast on Lava Street to the north side.
Amount Set By Judge



Corvallis
§ 6.10.060.100 Riding on Sidewalk. (2) No person, except a Police Officer in the performance of his/her official duties, shall ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk within the following boundary, including any and all adjacent sidewalks:

The northerly side of NW Jackson Avenue between NW Fifth Street and west side of the Riverfront bike path, the westerly side of Fifth Street between NW Jackson Avenue and SW Jefferson Avenue, and the southerly side of SW Jefferson Avenue to the west side of the Riverfront bike path; and the northerly side of Monroe Avenue between Fourteenth Street and Twenty-sixth Street, and the southerly side of Monroe Avenue between Fourteenth Street and Twenty-sixth Street.

Bail is $77.00



Eugene
§ 5.400 Operating Rules. (1) No person may ride a bicycle on a sidewalk in that area bounded by the outer limits of Charnelton Street on the west, 6th Avenue on the north, Pearl Street on the east, and 11th Avenue on the south. Violation Not to Exceed $50.00

In addition to or in lieu of a penalty for a bicycle violation, the municipal judge may prohibit the operation of a bicycle used in the violation on the streets of the city for a period not to exceed 30 days. In such event, the chief of police shall be directed to impound the bicycle, and retain it for the period that the operation is prohibited, or the owner's registration card held for the period during which the operation of the bicycle is prohibited.



Gresham
§ 8.55.070 Misuse of a Bicycle. Rides a bicycle upon a sidewalk within the city, except for law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties.

$175.00

If accident involved, fine increases to $235.00



Hillsboro
§ 10.28.100 Operation on sidewalks. Bicycles and skateboards may be operated on sidewalks within the corporate limits of the city excepting those sidewalks enumerated in subsection (A) of this section, and under conditions enumerated in subsections (B) and (C) of this section.

A. No person shall ride or operate any bicycle or skateboard on sidewalks adjacent to streets or on Public Service Building Grounds located within the following boundary: between the north line of NE and NW Lincoln St. to the south line of SW and SE Baseline St. and the east line of NE and SE 5th Ave. to the west line of NW and SW Adams Ave.

B. Bicycles and skateboards ridden on sidewalks permitted in this chapter may not be operated at a speed greater than ten miles per hour.

C. Any person riding or operating a bicycle or skateboard on any sidewalk of the city shall at all times yield the right-of-way to pedestrians using the sidewalk and upon approaching an area of pedestrian congestion, or children playing on the sidewalk, shall dismount and walk the bicycle or skateboard past the area of congestion or children at play. (Prior code §§ 7-3.10)



McMinnville
§ 10.36.080 Riding–On Sidewalks. No person shall ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk in the business district bounded on the west by Adams Street, on the east by Irvine, on the north by 5th Street and on the south by 1st Street. (Ord. 3629 §35(2), 1972).

$100.00 fine



Newberg
98-2500 Section 4. Prohibited Riding. No person shall engage in a riding activity in an area designated as a Prohibited Riding Area, as defined in Section 3(a).

Section 3(a) Riding as described in Section 1 is prohibited on any sidewalk or other City property in the downtown commercial area of the City or on a sidewalk or other City property adjacent to Newberg City Buildings, except public streets. The downtown commercial area is that area between River Street on the east, Main Street on the west, the north right-of-way boundary of Hancock Street on the north, and the south right-of-way boundary of Second Street on the south.

Maximum Fine is $500.00

Bail $72.00



Portland
§ 16.70.320 Operating Rules. (Amended by Ord. No. 165594, July 8, 1992.) No person may:

E. Ride a bicycle on a sidewalk, unless avoiding a traffic hazard in the immediate area, within the area bounded by and including SW Jefferson, Front Avenue, NW Hoyt and 13th Avenue, except:

1. On sidewalks designated as bike lanes or paths;

2. On the ramps or approaches to any Willamette River Bridge; or

3. In the area bounded by the west property line of SW Ninth Avenue, the east property line of SW Park Avenue, the north property line of SW Jefferson and the south property line of SW Salmon Street.

4. For police or special officers operating a bicycle in the course and scope of their duties; or

5. For employees of the Association for Portland Progress and companies providing security services operating a bicycle in the course and scope of their duties. These employees must have in possession an identification card issued by the Chief of Police certifying the rider has completed a training course in the use of a bicycle for security patrol.

Maximum Fine is $500.00



Roseburg
§ 8.02.140 Regulations relating to recreational-type or toy vehicles.

A. Roller Skates, In-Line Skates, Skateboards, Bicycles and Other Devices.

2. Excepting Police Officers and Police Explorers operating their bicycles in the course and scope of their duties, no person shall operate or ride upon roller skates, in-line skates, skateboards, bicycles or ride in, or by means of, any coaster, toy vehicle or similar device upon any sidewalk within the Downtown Development District as defined in Chapter 3.08 of this Code.

Chapter 3.08

Bounded on the north by Douglas Avenue on the South by Lane Street on the West by mid-block of Rose and Stephens and on the East by mid-block between Main and Kane and includes the Northwest corner of SE Stephens and SE Cass.

Fine Not to Exceed $1,500.00

May also impound for a period not to exceed twenty days.



Salem
§ 101.100 Riding Bicycles On Sidewalks. (a) It shall be unlawful to ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk within that area bounded by and including Front Street on the west, save and except the bridges, Cottage Street on the east, Union Street on the north, and Trade Street on the south; provided this subsection shall not apply to three-wheeled bicycles being ridden by a handicapped or elderly person.



Tigard
§ 10.36.100 Riding–On Certain Sidewalks Prohibited. No person shall ride or operate any wheeled vehicle, except wheelchairs, on any sidewalk adjacent and parallel to SW Main Street; and provided further, that any person riding any wheeled vehicle, excepting wheelchairs, on any sidewalk in the city shall at all times yield the right-of-way to pedestrians using such sidewalk.

5 days in City Jail or a fine not to exceed ten dollars, or both, or bicycle may be impounded for a period not to exceed fourteen days.



Troutdale
§ 10.24.010 Bicycles –General Requirements. B. It shall be unlawful for the owner or operator of any bicycle to ride or park the same upon any sidewalk or path constructed for the use of and commonly used by pedestrians within the corporate limits of the city.

Fine Not to Exceed $75.00



West Linn
§ 6.155 Bicycle Operating Rules. 1. Not ride upon a sidewalk within a business district.

Class A Infraction - Maximum Fine $500.00



Wilsonville
§ 5.100 Bicycles - Operating Rules. (2) Not ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk within areas as are from time to time established by the City Council.

No set fine




If you do not see your city in this list, contact your local city attorney or police department.
__________________
Riding my bike is MY pursuit of Happiness!!!
beam.to/UFOBike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-13-2008, 12:22 PM
Tait Tait is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 131
Default

My personal rule is that if you're riding on a sidewalk, you should be riding at something close to pedestrian speed. That is actually the law when riding in crosswalks, if I remember correctly. If you want to go faster, ride in traffic lanes intended for faster-moving traffic (i.e. the street).

[Conversely, if you're an evening stroller who does perhaps 3-4 mph, please don't take up a bike lane intended for vehicles moving 10+mph.]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-13-2008, 12:25 PM
Duncan Duncan is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Tabor
Posts: 188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tait View Post

[Conversely, if you're an evening stroller who does perhaps 3-4 mph, please don't take up a bike lane intended for vehicles moving 10+mph.]
How can you bike that slow? Thats as slow as I walk....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-14-2008, 08:00 AM
beelnite's Avatar
beelnite beelnite is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gateway
Posts: 543
Default

I've noticed that there are many drivers who assume that bicycles aren't allowed on any sidewalks whatsoever so they assume the rules for yeilding do not apply particularly at crosswalks.

Still other drivers assume that bicycles have no business in the roadway and should be on the sidewalk at all times.

So many misconceptions...

It's really scary when a driver interprets what a bicycle is doing as "wrong" or illegal and then get's angry and puts the cyclist in danger.

Yes, Driver's Ed and the Driver's test should also cover bicycle and pedestrian law if it doesn't already.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-14-2008, 08:17 AM
Duncan Duncan is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Tabor
Posts: 188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beelnite View Post

It's really scary when a driver interprets what a bicycle is doing as "wrong" or illegal and then get's angry and puts the cyclist in danger.

.
I am pretty sure that this doesnt apply in this situtation because:

My ex stopped as soon as she saw the bicyclist- despite the fact that (as far as I can tell) was in the wrong.

She was more cocerned with avoiding an accident than establishing right of way. she asked me for clarification only because of the way the cyclist treated her.

She wasnt the one screaming and kicking the car.

Now I will admit that when I was righthooked, my behavior was less then steller- and if I knew the driver I would apologize... despite the fact that she was wrong...I know that your adrenilin is running on high- but this guy kept at it long enough for my son to roll down the window and reply. I think it is important to note the use of violent threats and extremely profane langauge in the presance of 5,8 and 12 year old children by not the car driver but by the cyclist for an incident that occured because he was engaged in illegal acivity.

Maybe you should take into account that it was tall guy yelling at a short woman... that is uncool all on its own. Imagine someone say a foot taller and a hundred pounds heavier than you yelling at you from above... In my case that would be a 7'6" 350lb guy... say a cross between an NBA center and an NFL linebacker...

Now I am not a VC nazi, nor am I always following every law to the letter, but when I get myself in hot water while breaking the rules, I don't get mad at someone else, because if I am breaking the rules what happens to me is my fault. I think that due to the fact that the cylist was indeed breaking the law, riding unsafely that his behavior was unjustified as well as un called for.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-14-2008, 08:24 AM
Duncan Duncan is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Tabor
Posts: 188
Cool

In my mind the first rule of the road is "don't kill anyone", and if that means yielding to a pedestrian jaywalking or a redlight running cylist, thats fine... however I think that it is unsafe to presume that everyone else is watchinh out for you when you bike someplace you arent supposed to, especially at speed.

I also think this dude is a jerk because a block away is my favorite downhill bike run towards the river... 500' away he could have been doing 25 and flowing with traffic- so it isnt as though he had no other options.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-14-2008, 08:35 AM
beelnite's Avatar
beelnite beelnite is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gateway
Posts: 543
Default

Yeah I went off topic... my last post wasn't really about your incident... just a more general thing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-14-2008, 08:47 AM
wsbob's Avatar
wsbob wsbob is offline
Senior Member
Site Admin
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,755
Default

Duncan, as your wife described the guy as "...she described him as a commuter on spendy bike wearing yellow and a helmet...", was she fairly sure his clothes and bike were accurately telling her that the cyclist was intelligent enough to know how to deal with the situation appropriately? There are residences for disabled people in the NW 21st neighborhood. Maybe this guy was one of those. Unless she really knew the bike was spendy, there seems to a fair selection of cheap crap bikes that...well, at least to me, look spendy.

Maybe this guy just had a bad day. Good thing for him you weren't driving or it could have become a lot worse, fast! I wonder if there isn't something the school can do to resolve the parking lot exit visibility issue somewhat.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 PM.




A production of Pedaltown Media Inc. / BikePortland.org
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.