Posted by Jonathan Maus ( Publisher/Editor ) on October 21st, 2008 at 10:25 pm
Nobel Prize winning economist and NY Times columnist Paul Krugman has given some powerful punditry to the recently launched “Build for America” campaign. In an Op Ed piece published last week, he wrote:
“..right now, increased government spending is just what the doctor ordered, and concerns about the budget deficit should be put on hold.”
And here’s the part where he specifically calls out infrastructure spending:
“And this is also a good time to engage in some serious infrastructure spending, which the country badly needs in any case. The usual argument against public works as economic stimulus is that they take too long: by the time you get around to repairing that bridge and upgrading that rail line, the slump is over and the stimulus isn’t needed. Well, that argument has no force now, since the chances that this slump will be over anytime soon are virtually nil. So let’s get those project rolling.”
It seems like the battle might turn into, not if we should spend money on our transportation infrastructure, but on what type of infrastructure we fund.